SU0006921 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pameira Almond Processing Company N-1082706, N-1337.1-0,2-7,6-1,7-0,8.0 Section 6.4 of the rule species the acceptable test methods for source testing. The following condition will be included on the ATC to ensure compliance: The following test methods shall he used;NOx(ppmv) -EPA Method 7E or ARB Method 900, CO(ppmv) -EPA Method 10 or ARB Method 100, stet*gas oxygen-EPA Method 3 or 3A or ARB Method 9 00, VOC(ppmv) -EPA Method 18, 25A or 25B, or ARB Method 100, and particulate matter(gNdsot)-EPA Method 5. JDistdbt Rules f 08 i 4203, and 4702,] Section 7.0 specifies the compliance schedules for various sorts of engines,with Section 7.5 devoted to non-agricultural operation spark ignited engine.All of the compliance deadlines specified in Section 7.5 had passed when this application was submitted, so the applicant will be required to be in full compliance upon Implementation of the ATC. Rule 4801 Sulfur Compounds Rule 4801 requires that sulfur compound emissions (as SO2) shall not exceed 0.2% by volume. Using the Ideal gas equation, the sulfur compound emissions are calculated as follows: Csox = (0.03 g/bhp-hr)x(700 bhp)x(1 hr/0.045,056 MMscf)x 0 MMscf/131 MMBtu) x(1 MMBtu(7,648 dscl) x(1 lb 1453.6 g) x(1 Ib-mol/64 Ib)x (379.5 dscf/lb- mol) Csox = 6.1 ppmv Since 1.0 ppmv Is less than 2,000 ppmv, this engine is expected to comply with Rule 4801. Therefore, the DEI_condition limiting SOx emissions to 0.03 g/bhp-hr will ensure compliance. No further discussion is required. California Health &Safety Code 42301.6 (School Notification) The District has determined that this site is not located within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of the nearest K-12 school. Therefore, school notification under CH&SC 42301.6 does not apply to this project, and no further discussion is required. California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) The District performed an Engineering Evaluation (this document)for the proposed project and determined that the activity will occur at an existing facility and the project involves negligible r expansion of the existing use. Furthermore, the District determined that the activity will not have a significant effect on the environment. The District finds that the activity is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline§ 16031 (Existing Facilities), and finds that the project Is exempt per the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment(CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)). _ P 30 e