SU0001000 SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

KLEINFELDER File No. 20-3672-01 November 19, 1992 ITE_ .The dept and gradient of the water table;" Duringour surveys on October 8, 1992, we were only able atom assure groundwater dept of The groundwater one well (location 1 on Plate I). approximately 159 feet below existing ground surface. The regional groundwater dept PP Water map published by to San Joaquin County. icate the exactrdept t o groundwateConservation ntths District, Plate II of this report, does notin was between approximately 150 to area but does indicate that regionally, g 160 feet deep in sprang 1992. are Based on County requirements for a parcel split project drilling such sborings.e We are required to establish an on-site groundwater gra Y providing a general estimate of the groundwater erual elent vation on of groundwaterased on the die Plate P groundwater map showing lines o q Based on tog groundwater gradient in spring 1992 was III of this report, it appears that the main g roughly in to south-southeast direction north of to Mokelumne River and in to g Y southwest direction south of to Mokelumne Rive . their "Conditions of As requested by San Joaquin County Environmental Halthiresidence domestic well located P' q les from to Shively Approval," we collected water camp The samples were delivered to FGL at 26213 Mackville Road (location 1 on Plate I). environmental laboratory in Stockton for nitrate content and DBCP testing. The test results are included with this report. on of the that our scope of services did not include a detailed eveal l ial for the septic systems to affect project involves thetposs'ibil'ty We note groundwater. However, the to quality of g property. Therefore, with of only four additional septic systems within odeep tein6our opinion the likelihood of a groundwater measured at approximately 159 feet significant change in to nitrate level of to groundwater beneath to site, because of the 1 systems, is very remote. If additional, more-concentrated ndrate loading studyelopment is anned in additions y given to completing to area, we suggest that consideration be g Thinformation, m letes our scope of work at tis time. Based on the ae newptic This cop systems should be that to proposed parcels are suitable for septic system use. located and future wells should be constructed following maintained row requirements ut to duration of their monitoring of to on-site septic systems should e al Health e would e pleased use. Once this report is reviewed by Environmental Health Services, they wmay regbire for their furnish a proposal for providing whatever additional informs evaluation. Page 4 of 5 copyright 1992 Kleinfelder, Inc.