My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0001084 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACKVILLE
>
26950
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-92-60
>
SU0001084 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:28:20 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 9:57:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0001084
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-92-60
STREET_NUMBER
26950
STREET_NAME
MACKVILLE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
CLEMENTS
ENTERED_DATE
10/10/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26950 MACKVILLE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MACKVILLE\26950\MS-92-60\SU0001084\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Now *Ago,, <br /> Sievers Soil Suitability Study <br /> Page 4 <br /> i <br /> Due to the cemented nature of the soils encountered in the test pits, it did not appear that a suitable <br /> shallow percolating stratum existed in the general area. Consequently, a boring was made for a deep pit <br /> percolation test. This test hole was also logged by a civil engineer. A description of each soil encountered is <br /> contained in the Appendix as Log of Deep Pit Percolation Test Hole. Cemented soils were also encountered <br /> in this test hole until a depth of 21.5 feet. At this point a well graded medium sand was encountered until the <br /> maximum depth of 25 feet. <br /> Two percolation tests were performed, consisting of a shallow (36 inches) and deep (25 feet) test. For <br /> approximate location of percolation test holes(PT) see Tentative Parcel Map in the Appendix. Both percolation <br /> tests were performed in 8 inch diameter test holes that had a 4 inch perforated pipe backfilled with gravel. Both <br /> holes were filled with water 24 hours prior to running the tests. The last half hour of the tests readings were <br /> witnessed by a county health official and the test data obtained is enclosed in the appendix. <br /> A summary of the test results is presented next: <br /> Diameter of Depth of <br /> Test No. Hole Hole (,in.L Percolation Rate (min/in) <br /> PT-1s 8 36 No Percolation <br /> PT-1d 8 300 0.56 <br /> As anticipated and due to the cemented soils, the shallow percolation test showed no water drop over <br /> a 30 minute period after water remained in the test hole over night. <br /> VII CONCLUSION <br /> Based on the results of the shallow and deep percolation tests, the soil profile, and the performance of <br /> the septic systems in the surrounding area, it is our opinion that the new homesite resulting from the proposed <br /> parcel split should be suitable for the use of a septic tank, leach line, and dry well (25 feet deep) sewage disposal <br /> system. The proposed system however, should be properly designed and installed according to current San <br /> Joaquin County criteria. In addition, it should be noted that the proposed homesite is located in a low area <br /> compared to the surrounding grade. The cemented soils encountered at a depth of 2.0 to 5.0 feet act as an <br /> effective barrier to percolating rain water and provide for considerable seasonal perched water as indicated by <br /> —r trickling into test pit #2 and also the saturated surface silts in test pit #1. It is recommended that the <br /> location of any proposed septic system be kept on a uphill gradient and at least 6 feet above the lowest grade <br /> on the subject property. <br /> Based on the depth to ground water in the area, and the size of the proposed parcel, it is our opinion <br /> that the installation of the proposed septic systems, if properly installed, should not adversely affect the quality <br /> of the ground water in the area. <br /> VIII LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the existing and <br /> proposed development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the time we <br /> P pERS0 <br /> D � <br /> Z w <br /> O � <br /> 4Ssor\ <br /> V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.