Laserfiche WebLink
FHealth <br /> NTRODUCTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT <br /> this report was to investigate the property for real or potential environmental <br /> and report the findings to the Client and the San Joaquin County Environmental <br /> ment. This report complies with the San Joaquin County Ordinance, specifically <br /> 9-905.12(a) for a Surface and Subsurface Contamination Report. <br /> The subject property is located north of the intersection of Mackville Road and Liberty Road. <br /> Mr. John Shoup of Shoup Land Surveying has prepared the Tentative Map for this project, which <br /> is found in Appendix A. According to the San Joaquin County Development Title, a Surface and <br /> Subsurface Contamination Report (SSCR) must be conducted prior to Tentative Map submittal. <br /> It is my understanding the current zoning is AG-80 and there is no proposal to change the zoning. <br /> Interpretation of County Ordinance Section 9-905.12 (a)has been to focus on the subject <br /> property exclusively, unless it is documented or observed that an environmental concern in <br /> proximity to the subject property could potentially affect said property. <br /> This Surface and Subsurface Contamination approaches,but does not completely encompass the <br /> requirements of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) as promulgated by the <br /> American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM E-1527-00). The Environmental Health <br /> Department recognizes that the Surface and Subsurface Contamination Report is not intended to <br /> completely fulfill the requirements of the Phase I ESA. The Department does however, maintain <br /> that certain components of the Phase I ESA must be applicable to the SSCR, as follows: Section <br /> 7.1.7 of the ASTM Document states under"Sources of Standard Source Information,"that <br /> "information or other record information from government agencies may be obtained directly <br /> from appropriate government agencies or from commercial services." <br /> /§ 1.1, § 1.2 Mr. Robert Burns is proposing to subdivide two existing Parcels containing 332± <br /> acres into four Parcels. Proposed Parcel 1 is to be 84.37 acres, Parcel 2 is to be 80.67 acres, <br /> Parcel 3 is to be 80.18 acres, and Parcel 4 is to be 86.62 acres. Mr. Markus Bokisch is a partner <br /> with Mr. Burns on the agricultural development of the subject property. Mr. Bokisch's expertise <br /> is in the development and operation of wine grape vineyards. It is my understanding that a single <br /> family residential structure may be built on each Parcel in the future,with obvious sufficient land <br /> area for a second unit dwelling, if so desired. <br /> This report addresses and evaluates non-point sources of hazardous materials, as well as potential <br /> point sources. Non-point sources of hazardous materials include potential agricultural chemical <br /> residues and the potential for high nitrate concentrations in the underlying groundwater. Point <br /> sources investigated on the subject property include: two on-site wells with diesel pumps,diesel <br /> fuel storage tanks and apparent fertigation systems on both wells,which is described on Page 5. <br /> Agrichemical storage/mixing areas are also discussed. <br /> No chemical analysis was conducted for this investigation, nor was there an inspection of any <br /> surrounding buildings(since there are no on-site buildings) for asbestos containing materials <br /> (ACMs). <br /> Page -2- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />