My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007105 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MANTHEY
>
11293
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800102
>
SU0007105 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:32:53 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:04:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0007105
PE
2627
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800102
STREET_NUMBER
11293
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MANTHEY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19125014
ENTERED_DATE
3/31/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11293 S MANTHEY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/31/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MANTHEY\11293\PA-0800102\SU0007105\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rC2. SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY FINDINGS AND SITE EVALUATIONS <br /> f , <br /> As also determined in the original studies, the test results for this study have determined-that at <br /> different elevations, the property soils possess characteristics that are somewhat restrictive for the <br /> management of wastewater effluent with resp <br /> 'Pet top Y. ?Ts <br /> surabie difference in <br /> permeability was observed between Disper al Area#1 Area#2. permeability difference is <br /> inexplicable,but may be attributed to past duseca, ng soil co ion near the southwest . <br /> corner of the property. <br /> 2.1 Surface and Subsurface,Soil Characteristics <br /> f <br /> As was observed in the original 2006 studies, the surface did not consist of plowed soils. The <br /> surface soils.were dense and-compact, which can be attributable to sheep recently grazing on the <br /> property. Dispersal Area#1 soils were not as dense and compact as Dispersal Area#2 soil. <br /> 2.2 Soil Physical Test.Results <br /> The National Resources Conservation Service {MRCS) - Soil` Cons— -at n..Se�� dicates the <br /> soil type of the proposed disposal area in the SWC to beentas fine sandy 1oam��. Average <br /> available water holding capacity for this soil type is 0.1 fl i 5 Tnc enc or the t�op five feet of <br /> soil, for a total of 7.2 to 9.0 inches of water. Field capacity on average is 0.24 to 0.31 inch/inch for <br /> the top five ft of soil, for a total of 14.4 to 18.6 inches:of water. Field capacity is described as water <br /> held in the spaces between soil particles by which water under the in fgravity a from <br /> the larger pore spaces. Over the proposed Dispersal Areas'# #2 0 1:3 cres d 1.73 res, <br /> respectively, the top five fe t�af sail-ean hold: 1.32 + 3 = 3.0 s <br /> gals/ac-in x.--16.5 inche = 1,3 66,525 gallons of water 325,851 gals/ac= = 4.2 acre feet of. <br /> water: <br /> The Soil Analysis Reports from A&L Laboratoia, fm sto m. .' in Table 8, illustrate <br /> Particle Size Analysis for each sampled depth f 24 r 42 i , ft d -12 below ground surface. <br /> Sandy loam (USCS = silty sand - SM) is the pre ominate soil type, followed by loam and sandy <br /> clay loam. The sandy clay loam strata found at 8 ft in Dispersal Area#1 had failing percolation <br /> rates. <br /> 2.3 Percolation and Infiltration Test Results <br /> As with the original testing protocol, eight per op es at four prescribed depths were <br /> conducted within the proposed Dispersal Area #1 ` #2. <br /> t - - <br /> -. Page-3- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.