Laserfiche WebLink
v s <br /> From the original Nitrate Loading Study completed for the subject property in February 2003, the <br /> property has an a roximate c <br /> pp arrying capacity of 300 people. This must be considered as expansion <br /> takes place. As noted however, Lathrop City water and sewer are projected to reach the property in <br /> five to 10 years. <br /> With regard to the calculated nitrate-nitrogen loading to the underlying groundwater table, it is <br /> important to recognize that when adding one concentration of a solute (e.g.,NO3 N concentration <br /> determined in the effluent recharge) to another concentration of a solute (e.g.,NO3-N concentration <br /> determined in groundwater table), where both solutes are in ppm,the result is not cumulative or the <br /> sum of the two solutes. Parts per million is a mass ratio (mg per106 mg). For example,the Nr(the <br /> resultant average concentration of nitrate-nitrogen in effluent recharge in ppm of NO3-N), was <br /> determined to be 1.9 ppm by the Hantzsche-Finnemore Equation. This equals 1.9 milligrams of <br /> nitrate in 106 milligrams of water(one liter). If this 1.9 ppm concentration is added to the same <br /> volume of water(1 x 106 milligrams) of the concentration determined in the underlying ELF water <br /> table, which was 35.1 ppm NO3 N(156 ppm NO3),then the resultant concentration is now: 1.9 <br /> milligrams per liter+ 35.1 milligrams per liter= 37 milligrams in 2 x 106 milligrams(2 liters, or <br /> parts per 2 million) of water. Therefore, to convert back to ppm, the numerator and denominator <br /> must be divided by 2 with the result of 18.5 milligrams NO3 N per 1 x 106 milligrams, or 82.3 ppm <br /> nitrate NO3. Therefore, the mixing layer located at the top of the first aquifer consisting of recharge <br /> effluent and existing phreatic groundwater theoretically will undergo a dilution effect from the <br /> percolating effluent. <br /> At one point in time, there were four wells on the subject property. At present, only one well is <br /> observable,which is located adjacent to the west of the Office Trailers. The other wells are presumed <br /> to have been destroyed, although no well destruction permits are on file at EHD. If a well is <br /> subsequently discovered, Preston Pipelines must obtain a well destruction, or an out-of-service EHD <br /> permit for that well. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAINTENANCE <br /> A maintenance program must be established for the entire wastewater disposal system. However, this <br /> cannot be accurately assessed, quantified and implemented until the project is completely built-out and <br /> fully occupied. As referenced,predicting septic tank pump-out intervals is impossible because it is <br /> unknown as to the number of people on-site at any given time, and the composition of influent. Both <br /> these unknowns lead to changes in the quantity, quality and operational parameters of the proposed <br /> septic system. Because of the proposed showers and kitchenibreak-room area with a dishwasher, <br /> effluent characteristics may be similar to domestic sources instead of commercial sources. Because of <br /> potential dilution effect, the nitrogen content of the effluent may be lower than used in the calculations. <br /> It is anticipated to have the ELF tanks pumped yearly,or analyzing the scum and sludge thicknesses <br /> after a year of operation. When the first tank contents are pumped, one-third of the tank contents <br /> should remain in the tank for ballast. <br /> i <br /> 22 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />