Laserfiche WebLink
FrTheLF showed interesting soil perc test results between the 36 and 42 inch test depths. The perccrease by 4.5x in this distance, obviously indicating a coarser material at the 42 inch depth. <br /> an be beneficial with regard to nitrate loading under the following scenario: <br /> colating water encounters this coarser fraction,water does not immediately enter this stratum. <br /> oabove it must become relatively saturated before water will flow into this coarser fraction. This <br /> can create saturated soil microsites that are anaerobic and conducive for the promotion of <br /> denitrification. <br /> Hardpan stratum was not encountered in our drilling procedures. It is a possibility that it exists in <br /> the disposal areas. Hardpan should be investigated with a backhoe prior to the installation of the <br /> filter beds for the Office Trailers and Office Building. If hardpan is encountered, Chesney <br /> Consulting must be notified. <br /> From the soil chemistry results, it appears that denitrification is substantially occurring between the <br /> 5, 10 and 15 ft depths in the ELF, and between the 5 and 10 ft depth in the WLF(See Table 1)as evidenced <br /> by the significant decrease in nitrate-nitrogen concentrations. This precludes a wastewater system <br /> design with a denitrification cycle as stated in Item 3 b of the Conditions of Approval. <br /> The water table analytical chemistry results obtained for the ELF was to be expected at 156 ppm <br /> nitrate. The test results for the WLF were a inexplicable in that no nitrate was detected and the <br /> water was incredibly salty. It can be reasonable concluded that percolating effluent that reaches the <br /> water table will have a significantly better chemistry than what is in-situ and will lead to a dilution <br /> effect. Because of the apparent high denitrification potential in the soil profile for both disposal <br /> areas, it is our opinion that high nitrate concentration increases in the water table can be <br /> theoretically mitigated based on the soil test results. <br /> NLS§4.2, SSS§ 6.7 The design of the filter bed that will be placed high in elevation will take <br /> advantage of the indigenous soils that possess favorable qualities to inhibit nitrification. For <br /> nitrification that does occur, the anaerobic microsites at deeper elevations within the underlying <br /> soils promote denitrification. The denitrification potential in combination with landscape plants in <br /> the filter bed area should also reduce nitrate impact by evapotranspiring a percentage of the effluent <br /> during favorable weather times of the year(i.e., April through September). <br /> SSS§6.8 The Average Daily Flow is calculated to be 1,586 gals/day for the ELF. The Application <br /> Rate at the soil-effluent interface is 0.643 gals/ft'/day based upon the obtained perc rate of 20.8 <br /> min/in at the 24 inch depth. This suggests a disposal area of 2,466 RZ. Considering conservative <br /> criterion, EHD equations are applicable to arrive at a total filter bed disposal area size of 1,900 ft . <br /> NLS§ 4.1 The nitrate loading potential calculated on Page 14 indicates the percolating effluent <br /> may have a resultant nitrate concentration of 8.8 ppm, which is below the drinking water Maximum <br /> Contaminant Level (MCL). These calculations rely on numerous factors which are extremely <br /> variable and unknown at this time. These factors and the effluent quality itself can only by <br /> quantified after complete build-out of the project and an actual effluent sample obtained for <br /> analysis. <br /> 21 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />