Laserfiche WebLink
§ 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT <br /> This Surface and Subsurface Contamination Report(SSCR)contains the results of our findings for the <br /> subject properties located at the two addresses denoted on the Title Page. This report was prepared for <br /> one of the owners of the property, Mr. Tony Faria who is coordinating this project. Mr. Kevin Cole, PLS <br /> of Giuliani & Kull is the surveyor-of-record for this Lot Line Adjustment project. The purpose of this <br /> report was to investigate and identify real or potential surface and subsurface contamination existing <br /> within, or around the entire subject property and report the results to the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department(ERD). <br /> Within the text of this report, bolded Section (§)numbers are referenced at the beginning of an <br /> applicable Section number, sentence, paragraph or Appendices that correspond with the EEID <br /> Requirements Checklist for Surface and Subsurface Contamination Reports. <br /> According to the San Joaquin County Development Title,a Surface and Subsurface Contamination <br /> Report is required at the time of Tentative Map submittal. The Development Title, Section 9-905.12(a) <br /> states"A Surface and Subsurface Contamination Report shall identify any potential sources of surface <br /> and subsurface contamination caused by past or current land uses." The report shall include evaluation <br /> of nonpoint sources of hazardous materials including agricultural chemical residues and nitrate <br /> concentrations in the underlying groundwater. Potential point sources include fuel tanks, discarded <br /> items, past and present on-site septic systems, agrichemical applications, lead paint,asbestos, and <br /> electrical transformers. No chemical analysis was conducted by Provost& Pritchard Consulting Group <br /> for this investigation, nor was there an inspection and testing of the on-site residential structure for <br /> asbestos containing materials(ACMs)and/or lead paint. Since the onsite residential structure was built <br /> before 1980,there is a potential for the two contaminants of asbestos and lead paint to exist. <br /> Interpretation of County Ordinance Section 9-905.12 (a)has been to focus on the subject property <br /> exclusively, unless it is documented or observed that an environmental concern in proximity to the <br /> subject property could potentially affect said property. <br /> The Surface and Subsurface Contamination approaches, but does not encompass the requirements of a <br /> Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)as promulgated by the American Society of Testing and <br /> Materials(ASTM E-1527-00). The Environmental Health Department recognizes that the Surface and <br /> Subsurface Contamination Report is not intended to completely fulfill the requirements of the Phase I <br /> ESA. The Department does however,maintain that certain components of the Phase I ESA must be <br /> applicable to the SSCR, as follows: <br /> Section 7.1.7 of the ASTM Document states under"Sources of Standard Source Information,"that <br /> "information or other record information from government agencies may be obtained directly from <br /> appropriate government agencies or from commercial services." <br /> § 1.1 The description of the site and the project is as follows: The two subject Parcels currently <br /> consists of 149.68+26.1 = 175.78 acres, as illustrated on the attached District Viewer Maps. It <br /> is proposed to create two new Parcels from these existing two Parcels with proposed Parcel 1 to <br /> be 100.61 acres and proposed Parcel 2 to be 72.2 acres,for a total of 172.81 acres as illustrated <br /> on the Tentative Map. <br /> Page -2- <br />