Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE l <br /> LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA <br /> FOR SIGNALIZED,UNSIGNALIZED AND ALL WAY STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS <br /> STOPPED DELAY/VEHICLE(SEC) <br /> LEVET.OF ALL-WAY <br /> SERVICE TYPE OF FLOW DELAY MANEUVERABILITY SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED STOP <br /> A Stable Flow Very slight delay. Progression is very Turning movements are easily made, < 5.0 <br /> favorable, with most vehicles arriving during and nearly all drivers find freedom of <br /> the green phase and not stopping at all. operation. <br /> B Stable Flow Good progression and/or short cycle lengths. Vehicle platoons are formed. Many 5.1 - 15.0 5.1 - 10.0 5.1 - 10.0 <br /> More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing drivers begin to feel somewhat <br /> higher levels of average delay. restricted within groups of vehicles. ` <br /> C Stable Flow Higher delays resulting from fair progression Back-ups may develop behind turning 15.1 -25.0 10.1 -20.0 11.0- <br /> and/or <br /> 1.0-and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat 20.0 <br /> failures may begin to appear at this level. The restricted. <br /> number of vehicles stopping is significant, <br /> although many still pass through the <br /> intersection without stopping. <br /> D Approaching The influence of congestion becomes more Maneuverability is severely limited 25.1 -40.0 21.0-30.0 21.0- <br /> Unstable Flow noticeable. Longer delays may result from during short periods due to temporary 30.0 <br /> some combination of unfavorable progression, back-ups. <br /> long cycle lengths, or high volume-to-capacity <br /> ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion <br /> of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual <br /> cycle failures are noticeable. <br /> E Unstable Flow Generally considered to be the limit of There are typically long queues of 40.1 -60.0 31.0-45.0 31.0- <br /> acceptable delay. Indicative of poor vehicles waiting upstream of the 45.0 <br /> progression, long cycle lengths, and high intersection. <br /> volume-to-capacity ratios. Individual cycle <br /> failures are frequent occurrences. <br /> F Forced Flaw Generally considered to be unacceptable to Jammed conditions. Back-ups from > 60.0 > 45.0 > 45.0 <br /> most drivers. Often occurs with over other locations restrict or prevent <br /> saturation. May also occur at high volume-to- movement. Volumes may vary <br /> capacity ratios. There are many individual widely, depending principally on the <br /> cycle failures. Poor progression and long downstream back-up conditions. <br /> cycle lengths may also he major contributing <br /> factors. <br /> References: lliglnvuy Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985. <br /> Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 87, Highway Research Board, 1965. <br /> Trinity Baptist Church Project Page 7 <br /> Traffic Study <br />