My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003935 SSCRPT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
2905
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0200392
>
SU0003935 SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:21 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:13:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SU0003935
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0200392
STREET_NUMBER
2905
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
5/11/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2905 E MINER AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
9/17/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MINER\2905\PA-0200392\SU0003935\SSC RPT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 August 1995 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0151 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> 3.0. SITE ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION <br /> 3.1. EXCAVATION OF FORMER UST AREA <br /> A work plan for excavation of the former UST was prepared by Geological Audit Services, Inc. <br /> (GAS) and submitted to the San Joaquin County Public Health Services - Environmental Health <br /> Division(PHS-EHD). The work plan was approved in a letter from the PHS-EHD dated I 1 March <br /> 1992. However, excavation procedures did not commence until 1994. <br /> On 11 August 1994, approximately 300 cubic yards of soil were excavated from the former UST <br /> area. The soil was excavated by representatives of Bob Evans Trucking(BET). The soil excavation <br /> was monitored and supervised by representatives of GAS. Excavated soil was field screened for <br /> organic vapors using a photo-ionization detector (PID). Based uponfield screening, the soil was <br /> placed into"clean' and"impacted" stockpiles. Approximately 125 cubic yards of impacted soil was <br /> stockpiled on plastic sheeting along the eastern portion of the property. Approximately 175 cubic <br /> yards of"clean" soil was stockpiled adjacent to the excavation. <br /> 3.2. COLLECTION OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> Seven soil samples were collected from the floor and sidewalls of the excavation. Each sample was <br /> collected from the excavator bucket using a metric soil sampler loaded with two pre-cleaned 2- by <br /> 3-inch brass sleeves. The ends of the lead sleeve were covered with aluminum sheets, capped and <br /> sealed with tape. <br /> The samples were then transported under chain-of-custody procedure to Sparger Technology, Inc. <br /> (STI) in Sacramento, California. Each sample was analyzed for TPH-g and BTE&X in accordance <br /> with EPA methods 8015m and 8020, respectively. No TPH-g or BTE&X were detected in soil <br /> samples collected from the sidewalls or floor of the excavation. Analytical results of soil samples are <br /> included in Table 1. The laboratory report and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix B. <br /> 3.3. STOCKPILE SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> On 11 August 1994, two soil samples were collected from the "clean" stockpiles. Each sample was <br /> collected following the protocol detailed in Section 3.2. The samples were then transported to SPI <br /> and analyzed for TPH-g and BTE&X in accordance with the appropriate methods. No petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were detected in samples from the"clean' stockpiles. <br /> On 2 September 1994, representatives of GAS collected eight samples from the impacted stockpile. <br /> �" The samples were transported under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc. (MAI) and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.