Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> STANDARD PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES <br /> County, State and Federal environmental records were reviewed for sites which may have <br /> impacted the subject property.. The databases accessed did not indicate a problem or potential <br /> problem with the subject site. Potential environmental impact to the subject site from facilities <br /> within a one mile radius is unknown at this time; however, given that there are no commercial or <br /> industrial sites upgradient from the subject property, adverse impact appears remote. <br /> There are two primary sources of information which document and define past land use, although <br /> they are difficult to interpret. The first is the use of aerial photographs. Aerial photographs of <br /> the subject area in the 1970s from USDA Soil Maps indicate the property to be in pasture with <br /> no buildings (as best as could be determined). The second source of information can be found on <br /> USGS maps. The 1984 map for this area also indicates no buildings on the subject property. <br /> INFORMATION FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS <br /> Mr. Sephos has provided a property profile (See attached) which documents the history of the <br /> subject property and agricultural practices conducted thereon. Since the operation of the <br /> property has been well documented with both the profile and by the USDA aerial photograph, <br /> previous ownerships were not investigated. <br /> The following information was obtained visually or through an interview with Mr. Sephos: The <br /> subject property contains no underground or above ground storage tanks (USTs/ASTs). There is I <br /> an on-site, conventional septic system with a tank and leachfield area. No containers were noted <br /> on-site. Agrichemical application is done by Mr. Sephos' brother; therefore, he is assured that <br /> material has been applied correctly and accurately to its intended target with minimal drift. All <br /> agrichemical mixing is done off-site and applicable containers are returned to the agrichemical <br /> dealer. <br /> The subject property was surveyed for evidence which is indicative of surface and/or subsurface <br /> contamination: There is one transformer on the subject property which is new and probably does <br /> not contain polychloride biphenyls (PCBs) laden oil. If a nearby transformer owned by a utility <br /> company contains PCBs laden oil and there was a leak or explosion, it would be the <br /> responsibility of the transformer owner to mitigate environmental contamination. No evidence <br /> of solid waste disposal was noted. The site was carefully inspected for environmental concerns j. <br /> originating from discolored, disturbed/subsided soils, stressed vegetation/almond trees or <br /> unusual/noxious odors. None of these environmental indicators were present. As evidenced by <br /> the attached photographs, there are no hazardous materials stored on-site and no indication or <br /> observations of spills, drums or other items associated with hazardous materials. <br /> An important concern associated with the environmental assessment of agricultural properties is <br /> the issue of buried pesticide containers or discarded items. It was an occasional practice to <br /> dispose of containers by this method many years ago. To detect these types of underground <br /> 3 <br /> Va[ky Ag.research <br /> E <br />