My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004233 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOFFAT
>
10251
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-01-82
>
SU0004233 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:34 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:14:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0004233
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
SA-01-82
STREET_NUMBER
10251
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MOFFAT
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
MANTECA
APN
24320039
ENTERED_DATE
5/14/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10251 E MOFFAT BLVD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/7/2003 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MOFFAT\10251\SA-01-82\SU0004233\SS STDY.PDF \MIGRATIONS\M\MOFFAT\10251\SA-01-82\SU0004233\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FFK= vertical permeability as most conservative= 11.9 cm/hr x 24 hr/day x 0.0328 ft/cm=9.3 ft/day above) <br /> h to width ratio= 1, therefore, n= 1.7193 <br /> (coarse sand) <br /> days (10 yrs) <br /> Zm = 0.317x 105.2 x 0.0246 x 3.79 = 3.1 ft <br /> It appears that the maximum mound height that may occur under the filter bed, and above the <br /> current static water table depth is 3.1 feet. This would leave a marginal distance of approximately <br /> five feet between the soil/effluent interface and the top of the mound(soil/effluent interface =2 ft <br /> below grade+ 5 ft separation distance=7 ft, which the mound may rise to this depth.) For <br /> wastewater treatment to occur, the distance effluent must travel under unsaturated conditions <br /> through the soil environment is generally regarded to be five feet. Wastewater treatment in this <br /> respect is taken to be destruction of bacteria and viruses. <br /> If it is determined at some point in the future that mounding effects are preventing proper effluent <br /> treatment and disposal, the area designated as 100%replacement area may have to be activated. <br /> This may occur prior to attaining 2,500 gpd effluent flow volumes, but is unlikely. <br /> IV. SEPTIC SYSTEM OPERATIONAL CRITERIA AND DESIGN <br /> A. Nitrate Loading Mass Balance <br /> Wastewater characteristics emanating from the Aqua Pool and Spa facility are anticipated to be <br /> dissimilar to typical household domestic wastewater since there will be only toilets and sinks with <br /> no showers or washing machines. <br /> In determining nitrogen concentrations of septic influent and effluent, per capita intake of nitrogen <br /> per day must be estimated. The average American consumes between 70 and 140 g of N/day. Since <br /> nitrogen comprises 16% of the weight of the average protein, 16%of 70 g N= 11 g N/capita/day and <br /> 16% of 140 g N= 22 g N/capita/day. The average of these two values is 17 g N/capita/day of <br /> theoretical influent. <br /> The calculated or estimated nitrate impact to the soil and ultimately to the groundwater is extremely <br /> difficult to determine due to the number of variables involved. The concentration of nitrogen in <br /> septic system effluent is specified as units of mg N/L. Unfortunately, these units superimpose <br /> wastewater flow variability onto nitrogen influent variability, thus creating even greater variability. <br /> One researcher has averaged the means from 20 other studies to arrive at a concentration of 62 t 21 <br /> mg N/L in septic tank effluent. However, from previous studies within the County of San Joaquin, a <br /> small number of commercial facilities have averaged a Total Nitrogen concentration of 87 mg N/L. <br /> This concentration of 87 mg N/L can be considered a high, or strong strength wastewater, but will be <br /> used because of its safety factor in the calculations below. This is the estimated nitrogen loading in <br /> the effluent discharged from the facility without treatment of the effluent by the EnviroServer unit. <br /> Page -6- <br /> Ch&my Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.