Laserfiche WebLink
LMOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED MACHADO TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.1 AESTHETICS <br /> Lb. Substantially damage scenic resources? <br /> The nearest designated scenic route identified in the County's General Plan is the I-580 link <br /> L to I-5, approximately 2.0 miles south of the project site. The project site would not be visible <br /> from this designated scenic route. The site is vacant and there are no identifiable scenic <br /> resources on the property. Therefore, no impact would occur. <br /> L Mitigation Measure <br /> LNo mitigation measures are required. <br /> C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character of the surrounding area? <br /> L The visual character of the site is one of fallow land. Development of the site will convert <br /> fallow agricultural land into one of a landscaped mixed use community with parks, tree-lined <br /> streets and pedestrian paths that will interconnect with adjoining residential communities and <br /> the community park. The proposed project is consistent with the site planning criteria <br /> identified in Specific Plan III. <br /> L Mitigation Measure <br /> L No mitigation measures are required. <br /> d. Create a new source of light and glare that would affect day-or night-time views? <br /> Compared to existing conditions,the proposed project will create a new source of light and <br /> glare that is typical of residential communities and commercial/office/industrial park <br /> developments. As development plans are submitted for the individual parcels, applicants will <br /> i_ be required to submit preliminary lighting plans that comply with the MHCSD Design <br /> Guidelines. These guidelines dictate the type of streetlights that can be installed. The <br /> aesthetic impacts of developing the Specific Plan III area and the greater MHMP area were <br /> L evaluated and mitigated in the MEIR. The proposed project would not exacerbate the light <br /> and glare effects evaluated in the MEIR because the development proposed is comparable to <br /> that planned for the site under the MHMP and Specific Plan III. <br /> 6 Mitigation Measure <br /> No mitigation measures are required. <br /> 6s <br /> SOURCES OF INFORMATION <br /> LAssociated Engineering, Inc. 2006. Tract No. 3481, Tentative Subdivision Map, Unit No. 1, <br /> Machado Property, May 3. <br /> L EDAW. 2003. Mountain House Specific Plan IIIInitial Study, October 13. <br /> EDAW. 2005. Final Environmental Impact Report, College Park at Mountain House, <br /> L Specific Plan III, Volume III, SCH#2003102074,June 24. <br /> 4-5 <br />