My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006226
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
22261
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600161
>
SU0006226
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2019 2:19:14 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:18:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006226
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600161
STREET_NUMBER
22261
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
22261 S MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
RECEIVED_DATE
8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY\22261\PA-0600161\SU0006226\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
996
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
dedications and fair-share financing; and set requirements for school mitigation and <br /> participation in the San Joaquin County Multi-species Habitat Conservation and Open <br /> Space Plan. It would vest certain provisions/sections of the General Plan, Mountain House <br /> Master Plan, Specific Plan III, and the Mountain House Development Title for the proposed <br /> term of the Development Agreement(i.e., 25 years with up to three possible, five-year <br /> extensions). <br /> The proposed Development Agreement for the Machado Project is similar to the recently <br /> approved Regents Gate Development Agreement in that it includes the Regional Traffic <br /> Impact Fees(RTIF)as one of the vested elements. Therefore, the Machado Project, like the <br /> Regents Gate Project, is subject to the RTIF while Mountain House Projects with <br /> previously approved Development Agreements are not. <br /> REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: <br /> The project was reviewed for consistency with the General Plan, Mountain House Master <br /> Plan, Specific Plan III, the Mountain House Public Financing Plan, and other community <br /> plans. The project was found to be consistent with these plans. As part of this <br /> consistency review,the following matters were reviewed: 1)housing diversity and <br /> affordability, 2)Public Land Equity Program(PLEP) obligations; 3) school mitigation <br /> agreements; 4)hazardous materials; and 5) large lot Tentative Map conformity. Each of <br /> these is discussed in the staff report. <br /> The Planning Commission considered this item on consent and voted 5-0 to forward it to <br /> the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval. <br /> A legal ad for the public hearing was published in The Record on November 3, 2006. An <br /> additional legal ad was published in The Tracy Press on November 3, 2006. <br /> FISCAL IMPACTS: <br /> There is no General Fund impact as a result of this action. <br /> ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN FOLLOWING APPROVAL: <br /> None. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> KERR�LIVAN <br /> DIRECTOR <br /> KS:CM <br /> Enc.: Two Resolutions, Ordinance, Development Agreement, Board Order, Staff Report <br /> Board Clerk for Agenda November 14, 2006 <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.