Laserfiche WebLink
�. MouNTAAI House PRoPosED MAcnADo TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.10 MINERAL REsouRcEs <br /> Less Than <br /> Potential SPIIIEIR Significant <br /> `, Significant Requires Impact Due New New <br /> Impact Additional to Mitigation Additional Additional <br /> ` Less Than Adequately Review:No Measures in Impact Not Mitigation <br /> Significant Addressed in Significant Project Addressed in Measures <br /> Issue or No Impact SPIIIEIR Impact Description SPIIIEIR Required <br /> 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would <br /> the project: <br /> iIlia, <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a ■ U 11 Ll El <br /> known mineral resource that would <br /> be of value to the region and the <br /> residents of the State? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a ■ ❑ ❑ U <br /> locally-important mineral resource <br /> recovery site delineated on a local <br /> general plan,specific plan or other <br /> `r land use plan? <br /> SETTING <br /> Mineral resources in San Joaquin County are discussed in the County's General Plan(San <br /> Joaquin County, 1992). The only mineral resources in the general area of the Mountain <br /> '%W House community are quarries that produce aggregate for concrete. Four quarries are located <br /> South of Tracy,but none are located at or near the Machado property. The County's General <br /> Plan states that natural gas is located in several fields under San Joaquin County,principally <br /> in the vicinity of the Delta. <br /> %W SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> The Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate resources <br /> within the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area. <br /> �.. MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> Since the Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate <br /> resources within the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area,no mitigation measures were <br /> .. necessary. <br /> saw DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> ` a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to <br /> the region and the residents of the State? <br /> `r and <br /> 4-53 <br />