Laserfiche WebLink
Y <br /> Kerry Sullivan May 15, 2003Page 2 <br /> Williamson Act Minor Subdivision for Purpose <br /> of Sale and Construction of Residence <br /> The purpose of the Williamson Act is to preserve agricultural land. Government Code section <br /> 51246. The purpose is not for residential development. The Supreme Court in Sierra Club v. <br /> City of Hayward, 28 Cal.3d 840, 850 stated the Williamson Act was enacted to curb "the rapid <br /> and virtually irreversible loss of agricultural land to residential and other developed uses . . . <br /> (Emphasis added.) The Court of Appeal in Delucchi v. County of Santa Cruz (1986) 179 <br /> Cal.App.3d 814, 820 summarized the contractual obligations of the landowner and the county as <br /> follows: <br /> In 1965, our state Legislature enacted the Williamson Act in an endeavor to preserve <br /> agricultural land and discourage the premature and unnecessary conversion of such land <br /> to urban uses. (Gov. Code section 51200 et seq.)Under the act local governments are <br /> authorized to establish agricultural.preserves (Gov. Code section 51230) wherein land <br /> uses are limited to agricultural and compatible uses. (Gov. Code section 51243.) The act <br /> further empowers the government entity to enter into annually renewable contracts <br /> restricting land use for a minimum term of ten years. (Gov. Code sections 51240, 51242, <br /> 51244.) In return for agreeing to restrict the use of his land in accordance with the act, the <br /> landowner receives a reduced property tax assessment based on the value of the land for <br /> its current use as opposed to its market value. (Cal . Const., art. XIII, section 8, formerly <br /> I#aw art. XXVII, Sierra Club v. City of Hayward(1981) 28 Ca1.3d 840, 851 [171 Cal.Rptr. <br /> 619, 623 P.2d 180]; Honey Springs Homeowners Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1984) <br /> 157 Cal.App.3d 1122, 1131 [203 Cal.Rptr. 886]; Shellenberger v. Board of Equalization <br /> (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 510, 513 [195 Cal.Rptr. 168];Kelsey v. Colwell (1973) 30 <br /> Cal.App.3d 590, 592 [106 Cal.Rptr. 420].) The landowner may terminate the contract by <br /> serving notice upon the local government, but is proscribed from developing the land <br /> during the balance of the contract term. (Gov. Code section 51246.) Upon notice of non- <br /> renewal, taxes on the property gradually return to tax levels for nonrestricted property. <br /> (Rev. & Tax Code, section 426.) (Emphasis added.) <br /> The requirements of the Williamson Act are to be taken seriously. The courts in the above-cited <br /> cases strictly construe the Williamson Act. The State Department of Conservation has an interest <br /> in farmland preservation. Government Code section 51206,Public Resources Code section <br /> 10200 et seq. The Legislature requires the county to file a yearly agricultural preserve report with <br /> the Department of Conservation. Government Code section 51237.5. Currently, the Williamson <br /> Act is in jeopardy because the Governor desires to stop the payment of subventions to the <br /> counties that the counties use to help make up for the revenue lost through Williamson Act <br /> contracts. <br /> The proposed minor subdivision is to divide a 14.42-acre parcel into a 10 and a 4.42 parcel. This <br /> is consistent with the general plan and the zoning, which is AL-5. The 4.42-acre parcel is a gross <br /> cr..----i 71.4-. ry nrrrlrvanr to this analysis and the requirements of the Williamson Act and the <br /> Subdivision Map Act. <br />