My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006274 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JACK TONE
>
2850
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600524
>
SU0006274 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 2:44:06 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:25:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006274
PE
2666
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600524
STREET_NUMBER
2850
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
JACK TONE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
APN
10324016 17 18
ENTERED_DATE
9/27/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2850 S JACK TONE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
9/26/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\J\JACK TONE\2850\PA-0600524\SU0006274\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�oPqur ..cc <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 1-01 <br /> s ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton • CA 95202-2708 <br /> t' oa `P• (209)468-3420•Fax.(209)464-0138 • Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: 2$ S Q- 1-t,�r,� PA <br /> REPORT DATE: j 2 f 2 r(/01- <br /> = Sufficwnt <br /> I = Insumcient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> ie <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> © ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. SS 5- <br /> 1-2 <br /> -1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the she with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ® ❑ 2.1 Description of.depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. 3s Y• / <br /> ❑ ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. S S q, Z <br /> © ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. C-'s -q,3 <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> © ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project sites, 3 Nig yr. ; S,S, A/„J—P" S f`-"k'-"` <br /> ® ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site.r,�3 AA-, /9&a& 16t$ 16 <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. toy 3N� <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site./jy °/ <br /> © ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnenwre,or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable.P14a 2- <br /> N]® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc. �r S <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ® ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. ear S, 91,,,t� <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> Q ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. rAZOti✓T <br /> x❑ ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: v /G. Reviewed Date: 1121d? <br /> EHD2s-02-002 Page 1 oft SudxekSub Ch«klist <br /> ]n42003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.