Laserfiche WebLink
i_ <br />L <br />//The deep holes were also prepared by staff of Neil 0. Anderson on January 26, 2006 and the <br />24 hour presoak period was started. A 2 inch PVC pipe with perforations at the bottom was <br />installed into the test hole and gravel was poured in the annular space. <br />6.4 Description of the Date, Time and Condition of the Test Hole After the 24 -Hour Soak <br />i Period (Hole Still Intact, Hole Dry, Depth to Water Remaining in Hole, Etc.): On <br />January 27, 2006 the three our shallow test holes were dry. Six inches of water was added to the <br />holes and the holes were deemed suitab a to continue. Two of the shallow tests passed the <br />` minimum County requirements. <br />/ On January 27, 2006, two of the three deep test holes were found to be intact and the four <br />hour tests were performed. (See test results in appendix.) <br />✓ On February 1, 2006, the third deep test hole that was not intact at the time of the initial testing <br />L was re -drilled and prepared to San Joaquin County Standards. The four hour test was performed <br />February 2, 2006. <br />LS� 6.5 The ed to San Joaquin County Policy EHD 02-02 (Correct Depth, <br />diameter, " gravel, Water Refill, Correct Readings Recorded): The percolation tests <br />conformed to an oaquin County Policy EHD 02-02. <br />6.6 Complete Percolation Test Form (Including Readings) Was Provided With REHS <br />i Verification Signature. The Rate Was Correctly Calculated Using the Last Reading: <br />See Appendix for Test Result Form. <br />Shallow <br />TF -ST -HOLE *PERCOLATION RATE <br />arcel 50 MIN/IN (PASS) <br />arcel 2 41.6 MIN/IN (PASS) <br />Parcel 3 - (FAIL) <br />`- Deep <br />TEST HOLE *PERCOLATION RATE <br />Parcel 1 - (FAIL) <br />Parcel 2 - (FAIL) <br />Parcel 3 8.33 MINJIN. (PASS) <br />*See Results in Appendix. <br />✓ 6.7 Discussion of Any Potential Problems Predicted and/Or the Need for An Engineered <br />c > or Alternative Septic System: In this area, the soils are classified as Bruella sandy loam, <br />San Joaquin sandy loam, Rocklin Fire sandy loam, and Exeter sandy loam. Due to this <br />classification and percolation rates, a standard septic system similar to those found on <br />surrounding parcels would be recommended on all three parcels. <br />4 <br />c:\0471\Soil Report <br />