Laserfiche WebLink
September 30, 2007 <br /> NOA Project Number: E07141A <br /> It is Neil O. Anderson and Associate's opinion that, in general, near surface aquifers are more likely <br /> to have elevated concentrations of Nitrate and DBCP than the deeper aquifers. However, the <br /> contaminant concentration of one aquifer cannot give any indication as to the concentrations of any,�-'— <br /> other aquifer regardless of proximity. <br /> The presence of nitrates is not uncommon in shallow groundwater aquifers in San Joaquin County <br /> and other parts of the Central Valley. Nitrate in ground water occurs as a result of the application of <br /> fertilizers,livestock waste, and untreated septic tank waste. Nitrate is mobile and often accumulates <br /> in the shallow ground water zones. <br /> In the early 1900s, natural levels of nitrate in ground water were measured in forty-three wells <br /> tYree (43) <br /> throughout the Sacramento Valley by Bryan (1923). It was thought that ground water at that time <br /> was close to "natural" conditions. Based on the work by Bryan,it is estimated that under "natural" <br /> conditions, the ground water concentration of nitrate is no more then about 13.5 mg/L-NO3 (3 <br /> mg/L-N). Areas having 24.75 mg/L-NO3 (5.5 mg/L-N) or more are those in which nitrate <br /> concentrations ay be increasing (Hull, 1984). <br /> D� P was not detected ' the water sample. DBCP is a nematocide and soil fumigant for <br /> veg�t$bles-and-grapes. It is thought to cause health problems consisting of kidney damage, liver <br /> damage, and cancer. The use of DBCP was discontinued in 1979. The Environmental Protection <br /> Agency (EPA) set the maximum contaminant limit (MCL) at 0.2 parts per billion (ppb) because the <br /> EPA believes that given present technology and resources, this is the lowest level to which water <br /> systems can reasonably be required to remove this contaminant should it occur in drinking water. <br /> 4.5 Well Water Sample Collection, Handling, and Transportation <br /> The samples were collected in a sterile plastic container and two sterile glass vials. The samples were <br /> then transported on ice and remained under chain of custody to FGL Environmental, Stockton. \ <br /> 4.6 Chain of Custody <br /> The Chain of Custody document has been included in the appendix of this report. <br /> 5.0 SOIL PROFILE AND GEOLOGIC INFORMATION <br /> The site is de ori the Preliminary Geologic Map of the San Francisco - San Jose Cenozoic <br /> Quadra , as within region of Quaternary Fan deposits. The unit consists of gravel, sandy silt <br /> and,c y (Plate 3). <br /> The sur ace and near surface soils located at the site are reported by the San Joaquin County Soil Survey <br /> to be composed of the Capay clay,wet, 0-2% slopes (Plate 4) (USDA, 1992). Table 2 presents some <br /> selected properties of the soils: <br /> 5 <br />