Laserfiche WebLink
The final LESA scoring was as follows, per the LESA score sheet in the Model <br /> Instruction Manual: <br /> Assigned Factor Factor Weight Weighted Factor <br /> Scores Scores <br /> LE Factors <br /> Land Capability 80 025 20 <br /> Classification <br /> Storie Index Rating 66.38 0.25 16.595 <br /> LE Subtotal 36.595 <br /> SA Factors <br /> Project Size 100 0.15 15 — <br /> Water Resource 100 0.15 15 <br /> Availability <br /> Surrounding 80 0.15 12 <br /> Agricultural Use <br /> Protected Resource 50 0.05 2.5 <br /> Land <br /> SA Subtotal 44.5 _ <br /> Final LESA Score 81.095 <br /> Table 9 of the 1997 LESA Model Instruction Manual establishes the model scoring _ <br /> thresholds, as follows: <br /> Total LESA Score Scoring Decision <br /> 0—39 points Not considered significant <br /> 40—59 points Significant only if LE and SA subscores <br /> are each gleater than orequal to 20 points — <br /> 60—79 points Significant unless either LE or SA subscore <br /> is less than 20 points <br /> 80— 100 points Considered significant <br /> Based on the model LESA scoring system,under the assumptions described above, the <br /> conversion of the site would not have a significant impact on agriculture. <br />