Laserfiche WebLink
be a significant impact, terracing will be required every fifty(50)feet of height pursuant to Development Title <br /> Section 9-1415.3(k). The applicants indicated this would not be a problem. This impact is less than <br /> significant. <br /> Biological Resources <br /> "Waters of the U.S"(Wetlands). The EIR reviewed two mining options. Mining option 1 would leave <br /> Hospital Creek in place, mining both sides with a 100-foot setback from the centerline of the creek to the top <br /> of the mining slope(see figure 3-3, mining option 1). The second option would mine the creek. This project <br /> is for mining option 1. The EIR found that mining option one would not have a significant impact on"waters <br /> of the U.S". <br /> Special Status Species. The EIR determined that this project could have a significant impact on several <br /> special status species covered under the SJMSCP, including San Joaquin kit fox, tricolored blackbird, <br /> western burrowing owl, Swainson's hawk,white-tailed kite, and loggerhead shrike. The EIR determined that <br /> these impacts would be reduced to less than significant by complying with the SJMSCP for phases covered <br /> by the SJMSCP. For phases not covered by the SJMSCP(i.e., those in Stanislaus County), the EIR <br /> developed several mitigation measures that would reduce the impact to less than significant(see MMRP <br /> page 5-8, mitigation measures 4.9.2a-d). Biological Resource impacts are less than significant after <br /> mitigation. <br /> Cultural Resources <br /> The EIR found potentially significant impacts relative to damage to previously unidentified buried <br /> archaeological remains and human remains during project construction. The EIR found that these impacts <br /> to Cultural Resources would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation measures 4.10.1 and <br /> 4.10.2 (see MMRP page 5-12). <br /> Hazards <br /> The EIR determined that the project could have significant impacts relating to a possible existing <br /> underground storage tank, existing miscellaneous hazardous substances (e.g., gasoline, diesel fuel, <br /> solvents, etc.), above ground fuel tanks, and disease vectoring mosquitoes from the silt ponds. The EIR <br /> determined that these potentially significant impacts would be reduced to less than significant with <br /> mitigation measures 4.11.1, 2, and 4 (see MMRP page 5-13). <br /> Visual <br /> The project has the potential to conflict with the State of California Department of Transportation Scenic <br /> Highway Program and the County General Plan (specifically Resource Policy 13: "Development proposal <br /> along scenic routes shall not detract from the visual and recreational experience"). The EIR determined that <br /> mitigation measure 4.12.2 would reduce this impact to less than significant(see MMRP, page 5-13) <br /> Williamson Act <br /> Phases II and III (APNs 265-010-15 and 16)are under Williamson Act Contract(No. 77-C1-43). A Notice of <br /> Nonrenewal was approved for both parcels in October 2004 (PA-0400591). Those properties will be out of <br /> contract in 2015. Quarries are compatible uses under Williamson Act Contract provided that the land is <br /> rehabilitated for agricultural use, as is proposed (Section 9-1810.3[b][1][W]). This is a less than significant <br /> impact. <br /> The contract restricts development to uses that are compatible with the Williamson Act and Development <br /> Title Section 9-1805. "Compatible use"as defined in the Williamson Act includes uses determined by the <br /> San Joaquin County QX-01-2\Lonestar California <br /> Community Development Page 18 <br />