Laserfiche WebLink
4. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> r_ 4.5 NOISE <br /> Impact 4.5.3: Traffic associated with operation of the project would result in an increase in <br /> ambient noise levels on nearby roadways used to access the mine. This would be a <br /> potentially significant impact. <br /> ` Based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project,the proposed project would generate <br /> approximately 1,962 additional one-way vehicle trips per day during periods of maximum output <br /> (summer months). Haul trips by heavy trucks to and from the project site would account for <br /> almost all of this increase. Truck trips would typically begin as early as 6:00 AM but on some <br /> occasions would occur continuously on a 24-hour basis. These trips would be distributed over the <br /> local road network and would affect roadside noise levels. <br /> To assess the impact of project traffic on roadside noise levels, noise level projections were made <br /> .� using the Federal Highway Administration's(FHWA)Noise Prediction Model for those road <br /> segments that would experience the greatest increase in traffic volume(as determined in the <br /> traffic section of this report) and that pass by sensitive receptors. The results of the modeling <br /> effort are shown in Table 4.5-5. The traffic volumes used for the modeling effort are average <br /> morning weekday peak-hour volumes during periods when the mine is generating maximum <br /> output(summer)because that is when the project would generate the highest number of truck <br /> '- trips. Estimated noise levels shown in Table 4.5-5 correspond to a distance of approximately 50 <br /> feet from the centerline of applicable roadway segments, which is also the assumed distance to <br /> sensitive receptors. <br /> TABLE 45-5 <br /> EXISTING AND PROJECTED MORNING PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS <br /> ALONG LOCAL ROADWAYS <br /> Peak-Hour Noise Level,dBA,Leq ab <br /> rExisting Existing Plus Cumulative Cumulative <br /> Segment Plus Haul Haul Route Plus Haul Plus Haul <br /> No. Roadway Segment Existing Route Opt.l Opt.2 Route Opt.1 Route Opt.2 <br /> 1 Koster Road south of Blewett Road 63.9 63.9 63.9 70.0 70.0 <br /> .. 2 Blewett Road east of Koster Road 63.1 63.1 63.1 67.7 67.7 <br /> 3 Wetly Road north of Blewett Road 64,6 64.6 64.6 70.3 70.3 <br /> 4 Wetly Road south of Blewett Road 65.4 65.4 65.4 70.2 70.2 <br /> 5 Koster Road south of State Route 32 65.8 65.8 74.5 71.6 75.9 <br /> 6 State Route 32 east of Koster Road 75.6 76.4 76A 833 833 <br /> 7 State Route 32 west of Koster Road <br /> 75.4 76.1 77.1 833 835 <br /> 8 Blewett Road east of Bird Road 68.9 77,7 75.0 78.7 76.8 <br /> a Noise levels were calculated using the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model for weekday morning peak-hour <br /> conditions during periods of maximum production. Noise levels were calculated at roughly 50 feet from the <br /> centerline of the roadway. <br /> b For each of the roadway segments,the proportion of trucks and automobiles and their respective speeds differ for <br /> each road segment are based on the professional assumptions of Peters Engineering Group. <br /> SOURCE: Environmental Science Associates,2004 <br /> RMC Pacific vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclar tion Project 4.5-17 ESA/213015 <br /> Administrative Draft EDi Mmch 2004 <br /> r <br />