Laserfiche WebLink
4. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> 4.10 CULTURALRESOURCES <br /> is currently used for agricultural production, including apricot, almonds, and beans. No remnants <br /> of the Naval Air Station exist on the project site today. <br /> KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES — <br /> Methods <br /> The effort to identify cultural resources in the project area included a record search,contacts with <br /> Native Americans,and a field survey. <br /> A cultural resources records search of all pertinent survey and site data was conducted at the <br /> Central California Information Center on August 13, 2003. The records were accessed by <br /> utilizing the Vernalis and Solyo USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps and included the proposed <br /> project area along with a 1/4 mile radius around the project site. In addition to Information Center <br /> maps and site record forms,other sources that were reviewed included the Directory of Properties <br /> in the Historic Property Data Files for San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties,the National Register <br /> of Historic Places,the California Register of Historic Resources,the California Inventory of <br /> Historic Resources(1976),the California Historical Landmarks(1996), and the California Points <br /> of Historical Interest(1992). The records search indicated that no cultural resources have — <br /> previously been identified in or adjacent to the proposed project area. The records search also <br /> indicated that the proposed project area has not previously been subjected to archaeological <br /> inspection. <br /> The Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)was contacted by an ESA archaeologist on <br /> December 4, 2003 and requested to provide information on locations of importance to Native <br /> Americans and a list of Native Americans that should be contacted. The NAHC provided a list of <br /> three Native American organizations that should be contacted concerning locations of importance _ <br /> to Native Americans in the project area. ESA sent a letter to each organization on the NAHC list, <br /> providing information about the proposed project and requesting information on locations of <br /> importance to Native Americans (Appendix F). No responses have been received to date. <br /> An archaeological field inspection of the project area was conducted between October 7 and 14, <br /> 2003 by two ESA Registered Professional Archaeologists. The surface of the entire project area <br /> was inspected using systematic survey transects spaced between 20 and 60 meters apart. Surface <br /> visibility was excellent in most of the proposed project area because natural vegetation had been <br /> cleared for agricultural purposes (crops and orchards). — <br /> Results <br /> No cultural resources were identified in the project area as a result of previous investigations or <br /> the field survey conducted for the proposed project. No evidence of prehistoric or historic <br /> archaeological remains was identified in the proposed project area, and no historic buildings or — <br /> structures are present. Existing buildings and structures are less than 50 years old and are not <br /> considered to be historical resources. Although no archaeological remains were identified and the <br /> RMC Pacific Vemalis Querty Mining and Reclamadm Proj= 4.10-4 ESA/203015 <br /> Admm,stn Draft EER Mach 2004 <br />