Laserfiche WebLink
5. ALTERNATIVES <br /> Air Quality <br /> Under the No Project Alternative,there would be no new emissions sources or change in existing <br /> emissions sources from agricultural uses at the project site. The air quality impacts of the No <br /> Project Alternative would be less than those associated with the Proposed Project. <br /> Geology and Soils/Mineral Resources <br /> Under the No Project Alternative,there would be no immediate impacts to the site geology, <br /> topography,or soils. Agricultural cultivation would continue on the site and there would be some <br /> soil erosion associated with agricultural activities. However,there would not be issues with slope _ <br /> stability and the potential for excessive soil erosion with this alternative. The Geology, Soils and <br /> Seismicity impacts of the No Project Alternative would be less than those associated with the <br /> Proposed Project. <br /> Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> Under the No Project Alternative,existing on-site water wells would continue to be used for <br /> residential and agricultural irrigation purposes. Under the Proposed Project the on-site water <br /> wells would be used for mining processes in addition to silt ponds. The potential to alter <br /> groundwater flows,deplete groundwater levels,and contribute to local and regional groundwater <br /> overdraft would be lessened with the No Project Alternative. The addition of impervious surface <br /> areas and the storage of hazardous materials associated with mining would not occur and impacts <br /> to water quality would be less. The potential for hydrology and water quality impacts under the <br /> No Project Alternative would be less than under the Proposed Project. _ <br /> Biological Resources <br /> Under the No Project Alternative,impacts to biological resources from existing agricultural <br /> activities could still occur. However,the potential for on-site impacts to biological resources <br /> under the No Project Alternative would be less than those associated with the Proposed Project _ <br /> due to the lack of substantial physical changes to the site. <br /> Cultural Resources <br /> The No Project Alternative would allow continued agricultural use of the property. The potential <br /> for damage to archaeological and historic resources from deep excavations that could occur under <br /> the Proposed Project would not occur. <br /> Hazards and Hazardous Materials — <br /> Agricultural chemical use associated with the current agricultural practices on the site would <br /> continue under the No Project Alternative. The Proposed Project would involve the installation <br /> and use of above-ground fuel storage tanks,and the storage and use of hazardous materials <br /> associated with mining. New types of hazardous materials would be brought onto the site with <br /> the Proposed Project. Potential hazards associated with mining pits would not occur with the No <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quauy Mining and Reclamauon Project 5-8 FSA/203015 <br /> Admmistiative Draft©R March 2004 <br />