My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. ALTERNATATS <br /> status species exists at this site. However, a biologist would need to perform a preliminary <br /> review of the off-site alternative to determine the potential for wetlands and special status species <br /> at the site. The off-site alternative is located entirely within San Joaquin County, so for this <br /> alternative the applicant would be able to comply with the SJMSCP in-lieu of implementing the — <br /> proposed project Mitigation Measures 4.9.2a-e. Complying with the SJMSCP would provide for <br /> pre-construction surveys,impact avoidance and minimization measures, and preservation of open <br /> space as mitigation. Biological impacts associated with development at this site would be similar <br /> or could be greater,depending on the outcome of the necessary surveys, than those associated <br /> with the Proposed Project. <br /> Cultural Resources <br /> No cultural resources were found at the proposed project site. It is unknown if cultural resources — <br /> exist at the off-site alternative but it is likely that since the area has been highly disturbed from <br /> agricultural activities that no surface resources exist. If this alternative is chosen a cultural <br /> resources record search and survey would need to be completed. The potential to uncover <br /> unidentified buried archaeological remains or human remains would be similar, or could be <br /> greater than that of the proposed project site,depending on the outcome of the necessary survey. <br /> Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br /> The off-site alternative contains similar features as the proposed project, such as agricultural crop <br /> land,creek beds,and rural residential structures. Therefore,it can be assumed that the types of <br /> hazardous materials that might exist at the off-site alternative would be similar to those of the <br /> proposed project. An assessment of the off-site alternative would need to be completed to <br /> determine if any existing hazardous materials or contamination exist on the site or if there is a <br /> potential for contamination at the site from any off-site sources in the area. Hazards and <br /> Hazardous Materials impacts associated with this alternative would be similar or could be greater, <br /> depending on the outcome of the necessary assessment, than those associated with the Proposed <br /> Project. , <br /> Visual Resources <br /> The off-site alternative is located within the same general viewing area as the proposed project. <br /> The visual character of the area is similar to the proposed project,predominantly rural and <br /> agricultural with some mining operations in the area. Mining operations at the off-site alternative <br /> has the potential to impact scenic views of the Coastal Range Mountains and San Joaquin Valley <br /> and to conflict with adopted Plans and Policies relating to visual resources. Visual Resources <br /> impacts associated with this alternative would be similar to those associated with the proposed _ <br /> project. Mitigation measures similar to those identified in Section 4.12 would be required. <br /> RMC Fa ific Vem hs Quany Motion and Reclamation Pmjmt 5-18 ESA/203015 <br /> Administrative Draft EIR Mamh 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.