SU0004094 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r i i r r r r s t t r S. ALTERNATIVES TABLE 5-3(Continued) COMPARISON MATRIX OF THE PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 (Reduced Project (Reduced Project Alternative 3 (No Project Production) Production) (Offsite Proposed Alternative) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Alternative) Project Hydrology and Water Quality Groundwater loss due to evaporation LS PS PS PS PS Degradation of groundwater quality LS PS PS PS PS Potential for contamination to enter existing groundwater wells LS PS PS PS PS Depletion of groundwater supplies IS PS PS PS PS Decrease infiltration of surface water and reduce groundwater LS LS LS LS LS recharge Alter the natural hydrology of a creek LS SU LS SU SU Flooding impacts LS LS LS LS LS Biological Resources Impacts to"Waters of the U.S.."including wetlands LS PS PS PS PS Impacts to special status species covered under the SJMSCP LS PS Ps- PS PS Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural LS LS LS LS LS community conservation plan Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other LS LS LS LS LS sensitive natural community Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident LS LS LS LS LS or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting LS LS LS LS LS biological resources _.—._ ...... ------ ---_..-_. KeY'. ........... -- ...... — LS=Less-than-Significant S=Significant U=Unknown +=Greater in magnitude PS=Potentially Significant SU=Significant and Unavoidable NA=Not Applicable -=Lesser in magnitude RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Meting and Reclamation Project 5-23 FSA/203015 Administrative Draft FSR March 2004