SU0004094 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Executive Summary TABLE ES-1 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Level of Significance (Level of Significance Prior to Mitigation) After Mitigation 6.5 Traffic noise levels resulting from the increase in traffic 6.5.1 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.5.3. Significant volumes associated with operation of the mine will be cumulatively considerable when considered along with past,present,and future projects in the project area, which will result in increased noise levels at residences located along truck haul routes. The cumulative impact would be significant. (S) 6.6 The slope instability hazards would remain specific to the No mitigation is required. proposed RMC project site and be localized with the active mining area and therefore would not contribute to a region-wide cumulative slope instability condition.This would be a less-than-significant impact.(LS) 6.7 With mitigation,the project would not contribute to 6.7.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.8.1 a,4.8.1b,4.8.2,and 4.8.3 to Less than significant cumulative, regional adverse impacts on the lower Tulare mitigate the project's incremental contribution to groundwater supply Formation aquifer. Cumulative impacts would be and quality impacts. potentially significant. (PS) 6.8 The project under Mining Option 2(mining out Hospital 6.8.1 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.8.6. Project: Less than Creek and constructing a berm to form a large detention significant basin)could contribute to the cumulative reduction of Mining Plan Option 2: Flows to the San Joaquin River. Cumulative impacts Significant would be significant.(S) 6.9 Cumulative impacts would be associated with increased 6.9.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.9.2a,4.9.21b,and 4.9.2c to mitigate Less than significant disturbance to potential special-status species due to the project's incremental contribution to biological resource impacts. increased noise, loss of agricultural land and potential habitat,increased traffic along roadways which could potentially increase mortality of wildlife.The project's contribution to cumulative impacts to biological resources is potentially significant.(PS) 6.10 The project's contribution to cumulative impacts to 6.10.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.10.1,and 4.10.2 to mitigate the Less than significant cultural resources is potentially significant. (PS) project's incremental contribution to cultural resource impacts. PS=Potentially significant;LS=Less than significant;S=Significant Cemex Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Propct ES-26 ESA 1213015 Final Emimnmantal Imp aReport 1 Juna 200.9