Laserfiche WebLink
-- <br /> Executive Summary <br /> TABLE 2-1 (CONTINUED) <br /> SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Level of Significance <br /> (Level of Significance Prior to Mitigation) After Mitigation <br /> Visual Resources <br /> 4,12.1 Implementation of the project has the potential to No mitigation is required. <br /> adversely impact scenic views of the Coastal Range <br /> Mountains and San Joaquin Valley.This is a less-than- <br /> significant impact.(LS) <br /> 4.12.2 Implementation of the project has the potential to conflict 4.12.2 Features tall enough to be seen above the visual screening Less than Significant <br /> with adopted plans and policies relating to visual (processing plant,conveyor towers,loading hoppers,etc.)shall be <br /> resources.This is a potentially significant impact.(PS) painted in earthtones to minimize their visibility but still must remain <br /> visible to air traffic in the area such as crop dusters. <br /> Cumulative Impacts <br /> 6.1 Cumulative development would not be expected to result No mitigation is required. <br /> in an overall cumulative adverse land use impact since <br /> the County has designated mining as an acceptable use <br /> on agricultural land. This would be a less-than-significant <br /> impact. (LS) <br /> 6.2 The project when combined with other large-scale mining No mitigation is required. <br /> operations in the area,would not add incrementally to the <br /> cumulative loss of agricultural production in the area.This <br /> is a less-than-significant impact.(LS) <br /> 6.3 The cumulative increase in traffic volumes associated 6.3.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.4.1a,4.4.1 b,4.4.3,4.4.4,and 4.4.5 Less than significant <br /> with operation of the mine and past,present,and future to mitigate the project's incremental contribution to cumulative traffic <br /> projects in the project area would result in increased impacts. <br /> impacts on area roadways and/or intersections. This <br /> would be a potentially significant impact.(PS) <br /> 6.4 The project will result in increased traffic volumes that in 6.4.1 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.6.2 to reduce the project's Significant <br /> turn will cause an incremental effect on air quality that is incremental contribution to cumulative air quality impacts. <br /> cumulatively considerable when considered along with <br /> past,present,and future projects in the project area. The <br /> combined impact of those projects on air quality would be <br /> a significant impact. (S) <br /> Cemex Vemalia Qua"Mining and Reclamation Project ES-25 ESA 1203015 <br /> Final Environmental Impact Report June 2008 <br />