My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transportation and Circulation <br /> Truck traffic transporting material from the off-site alternative to the market in the Tracy area <br /> would travel a shorter distance than the project. The traffic impacts along major roadways and <br /> highways from the Vernalis area to the Tracy area, such as SR 132 and Interstate 5,would be <br /> reduced with this alternative. However, impacts to the off-site alternative local roadways and <br /> intersections would be similar to those of the project. <br /> Transportation and circulation impacts would be similar or could be less than those associated <br /> with the project due to the shorter distances traveled by the trucks and fewer major roadways <br /> impacted within San Joaquin County. (Draft EIR,p. 5-17.) <br /> Noise <br /> The noise generated by mining equipment, excavation activities, and processing operations at the <br /> off-site alternative would be similar to the project. The off-site alternative includes adjacent and <br /> nearby rural residences in a greater number than at the project site. This would result in a greater <br /> number of residences being impacted by an increase in ambient noise levels from the mining <br /> operations. Traffic noise would also increase on nearby roadways used to access the quarry. The <br /> off-site alternative would result in similar noise impacts as the project,but to a greater number of <br /> residences in the area. Mitigation measures similar to those identified in Section 4.5 would be <br /> required. (Draft EIR, p. 5-17.) <br /> Air Quality <br /> The dust generated by project construction, the emissions generated by the mining and <br /> processing operations, and the diesel particulate emissions from stationary and mobile sources <br /> would be similar to the project. The off-site alternative includes adjacent and nearby rural <br /> residences in a greater number than at the project site. This would result in a greater number of <br /> residences being impacted by dust and other emissions from the mining operations and traffic. <br /> The off-site alternative would result in similar air impacts as the project,but to a greater number . <br /> of residences in the area. Mitigation measures similar to those identified in Section 4.6 of the <br /> Draft EIR would be required. (Draft EIR,p. 5-17.) <br /> Geology and Soils/Mineral Resources <br /> The slope instability, erosion, and seismic impacts associated with the off-site alternative would <br /> be similar to those of the project. Mitigation measures similar to those identified in Section 4.7 of <br /> the Draft EIR would be required. (Draft EIR,p. 5-17.) <br /> Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> The off-site alternative contains rural residential housing and agricultural crops that most likely <br /> use groundwater wells for domestic and irrigation uses. The off-site alternative has two creeks <br /> that cross the site in two different areas. Hydrology impacts would be increased with the off-site <br /> alternative if the creeks were to be mined out as,in the project Mining Plan Option 2. This would <br /> result in a significant impact of altering the natural hydrology of these creeks, the same as the <br /> project, Mining Option 2. Otherwise, the creeks would be avoided by providing a 100-foot buffer <br /> 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.