Laserfiche WebLink
2.Executive Summary <br /> TABLE 2.1 (CONTINUED) <br /> SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Level of Significance <br /> (Level of Significance Prior to Mitigation) After Mitigation <br /> 6.8 The project under Mining Option 2(mining out Hospital 6.8.1 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.8.6. Project: Less than significant <br /> Creek and constructing a berm to form a large detention Mining Plan Option 2: Signif cant <br /> basin)could contribute to the cumulative reduction of <br /> flows to the San Joaquin River. Cumulative impacts <br /> would be significant.(S) <br /> 6.9 Cumulative impacts would be associated with increased 6.9.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.9.2a,4.9.2b,and 4.9.2c Less than significant <br /> disturbance to potential special-status species due to to mitigate the project's incremental contribution to <br /> increased noise,loss of agricultural land and potential biological resource impacts. <br /> habitat,increased traffic along roadways which could <br /> potentially increase mortality of wildlife.The project's <br /> contribution to cumulative impacts to biological resources <br /> is potentially significant.(PS) <br /> 6.10 The project's contribution to cumulative impacts to 6.10.1 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.10.1,and 4.10.2 to <br /> cultural resources is potentially significant.(PS) mitigate the project's incremental contribution to cultural <br /> resource impacts. <br /> PS=Potentially significant;LS=Less than significant;S=Significant <br /> RMC Pacific Vemalie Quarry Mining and Reclamation Pmiect 2-28 ESA I Pmlect No.203015 <br /> Draft Enoronmenlal Impact Report May 2006 <br /> I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I <br />