Laserfiche WebLink
4.Environmental Analysis — <br /> therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented prior to implementation <br /> of any Phase of mining: <br /> (I) Comply with the SJMSCP.For Phases complying with the SJMSCP,no further _ <br /> mitigation is required,or <br /> (II) For Phases not covered under the SJMSCP,a habitat assessment for burrowing owls <br /> shall be conducted in the year prior to implementation of each Phase. Burrowing owl <br /> site assessments are generally only valid for one year. The site assessment for <br /> burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the CDFG <br /> Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation(CDFG, 1995), as updated. If warranted — <br /> by the site assessment protocol(CDFG, 1995), as updated, pre-construction surveys <br /> for burrowing owls shall be conducted in suitable habitat within 500 feet of each <br /> Phase's boundaries. These surveys require two site visits, once in December to — <br /> January, and once April 15 to July 15. <br /> (III) If occupied burrows are recorded within a 500-foot buffer from the Phase, the project — <br /> shall avoid mining operations within a 160-foot buffer of active burrows from <br /> September I to January 31 and within a 250-foot buffer from February 1 to August <br /> 31. If avoidance is not possible,then measures may also include(in consultation with _ <br /> CDFG)passive relocation and destruction of occupied burrows during the non- <br /> breeding season(October—January).To mitigate for the loss of any burrows,the <br /> applicant shall enhance and/or create or pay fees to create and/or enhance burrows at <br /> a 2:1 ratio at a protected site in San Joaquin or Stanislaus Counties. The protected site — <br /> shall include 6.5 acres of foraging habitat per occupied burrow lost contiguous with <br /> occupied burrow sites to compensate for the loss of each pair of breeding owls,or <br /> single,unpaired resident owl. — <br /> Impact Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant. <br /> Impact 4.9.3: The project will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or <br /> natural community conservation plan.This would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> The project will either comply with the SJMSCP,or will provide avoidance and mitigation <br /> measures commensurate with the SJMSCP. For this reason, the project would result in a less- <br /> than-significant impact. <br /> Mitigation: No mitigation is required. <br /> Impact 4.9.4: The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat <br /> or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies,or <br /> regulations or by the CDFG or USFWS.This would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> Under Mining Plan Option 1,Hospital Creek would be protected by a 100-foot setback and no <br /> riparian vegetation would be affected. Under Mining Plan Option 2, Hospital Creek(a highly <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 4.9-18 ESA/203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />