My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 5 <br /> Alternatives <br /> 5.1 Introduction <br /> The purpose of the alternatives analysis in an environmental impact statement(EIR) is to describe <br /> W. a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the project location, that could feasibly <br /> attain most of the objectives of the project, but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the <br /> significant effects of the project,and to evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives <br /> (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.6[a]). <br /> Additionally, Section 15126.6 (b) of the CEQA Guidelines requires consideration of alternatives <br /> that could reduce to a less-than-significant level or eliminate any significant adverse <br /> environmental effects of the Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project(project), including <br /> alternatives that may be more costly or could otherwise impede to some degree the attainment of <br /> 6. the project's objectives.The range of alternatives considered must include those that offer <br /> substantial environmental advantages over the project and may be feasibly accomplished in a <br /> I <br /> successful manner considering economic,environmental, social,technological, and legal factors. <br /> 5.1 .1 Factors in Selection of Alternatives <br /> low <br /> The CEQA Guidelines suggest, but do not explicitly require,that an EIR should briefly describe <br /> the rationale for selecting the alternatives to be discussed, identify any alternatives that were <br /> considered by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible, and briefly explain the reasons <br /> underlying the lead agency's determination [CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.6(c)]. <br /> The alternatives addressed in this EIR were selected in consideration of one or more of the <br /> following factors: <br /> ►• . The extent to which the alternative would accomplish most of the basic goals and <br /> objectives of the project(See Chapter 3,Project Description); <br /> r • The extent to which the alternative would avoid or lessen any of the identified <br /> significant environmental effects of the project; <br /> • The feasibility of the alternative,taking into account site suitability, economic <br /> viability,availability of infrastructure, General Plan consistency,and consistency <br /> with other applicable plans and regulatory limitations; <br /> r • The appropriateness of the alternative in contributing to a"reasonable range"of <br /> alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice;and <br /> 116 RMC Pacific Vemalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 5-1 ESA/203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br /> ho <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.