My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.Alternatives — <br /> • The requirement of the CEQA Guidelines to consider a"no project'alternative and — <br /> to identify an"environmentally superior"alternative in addition to the no-project <br /> alternative [CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.6(e)]. <br /> In view of the factors presented above, the following alternatives were selected for evaluation in <br /> this EIR: <br /> Alternative 1 —No Project Alternative <br /> Alternative 2—Reduced Project Production <br /> Alternative 3—Off-Site Alternative <br /> 5.1 .2 Alternatives Eliminated from Further Consideration <br /> CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(2)specifically addresses the requirements for <br /> consideration of alternate locations. A pivotal consideration is whether any of the significant <br /> impacts of the project would be avoided or substantially lessened by placing the project at another _ <br /> location. If another location would not avoid or substantially lessen the environmental impacts <br /> associated with the project location,or if the alternate location would result in one or more <br /> significant adverse environmental effects in addition to those caused at the proposed location, — <br /> then such alternate location may be rejected from further analysis in the EIR. If,during the <br /> scoping process for the EIR,the lead agency concludes that no feasible and environmentally <br /> superior alternate locations exist,the reasons for this conclusion must be briefly explained in the — <br /> EIR. <br /> Alternative Processing Plant Location <br /> This alternative was considered but eliminated from further consideration. Even though some of <br /> the impacts might be reduced over those of the proposed project others would be increased. <br /> Description <br /> Under this alternative, other on-site locations for the processing plant were considered. Two <br /> locations with primary site access from Blewett Road were considered. A location further south <br /> along Koster Road was also considered. — <br /> The two locations considered with access from Blewett Road were: (1)the corner of Blewett <br /> Road and Koster Road(Phase IV)and(2) along the eastern side of the project site(mining — <br /> Phase VII or Phase VIII). The location considered further south on Koster Road is the vicinity of <br /> mining Phase II or Phase III. <br /> Basis for Selection <br /> This alternative is included in the EIR to provide a basis for comparing the impacts of a relocated — <br /> processing plant on-site.Moving the processing plant so that the access to the site would be along <br /> Blewett Road may potentially reduce traffic impacts on Koster Road and those at the intersection <br /> of Koster Road and Blewett Road. Moving the processing plant to a location further south on <br /> Koster Road may potentially reduce visual impacts to residents located along Blewett Road and <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 5-2 ESA 1203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.