Laserfiche WebLink
5.Altemaltws — <br /> that cross the site in two different areas. Hydrology impacts would be increased with the off-site — <br /> alternative if the creeks were to be mined out as in the project Mining Plan Option 2. This would <br /> result in a significant impact of altering the natural hydrology of these creeks,the same as the <br /> project,Mining Option 2. Otherwise, the creeks would be avoided by providing a 100-foot buffer <br /> as in the project Mining Plan Option 1. All other hydrology and water quality impacts and the <br /> mitigation measures provided in Section 4.8, such as groundwater seepage in the mining <br /> excavations causing evaporation loss and threatening groundwater quality,potential spills of <br /> hazardous materials reaching the groundwater,potential for contaminants to enter the <br /> groundwater if excavation disturbs and/or truncates the existing groundwater well shafts,and <br /> groundwater extraction that could lower groundwater levels in areas beyond the site would be <br /> similar to the project Impacts to groundwater quality from contaminants entering <br /> disturbed/truncated wells could be greater since it is assumed that with additional residential uses — <br /> surrounding the site,there are more wells in the area. <br /> Biological Resources <br /> The off-site alternative contains similar features as the project, such as agricultural crop land, <br /> creek beds,and rural residential structures.The potential to impact wetlands and special status <br /> species exists at this site. However,a biologist would need to perform a preliminary review of the <br /> off-site alternative to determine the potential for wetlands and special-status species at the site. <br /> The off-site alternative is located entirely within San Joaquin County, so for this alternative, the _ <br /> applicant would be able to comply with the SJMSCP as set forth in Mitigation Measures 4.9.2a-d. <br /> Complying with the SJMSCP would provide for pre-construction surveys, impact avoidance and <br /> minimization measures, and preservation of open space as mitigation. Biological impacts <br /> associated with development at this site would be similar or could be greater, depending on the <br /> outcome of the necessary surveys,than those associated with the project. <br /> Cultural Resources <br /> No cultural resources were found at the project site. It is unknown if cultural resources exist at the <br /> off-site alternative,but it is likely that since the area has been highly disturbed from agricultural — <br /> activities, no surface resources exist. If this alternative is chosen,a cultural resources record <br /> search and survey would need to be completed.The potential to uncover unidentified buried — <br /> archaeological remains or human remains would be similar to or could be greater than that of the <br /> project site,depending on the outcome of the necessary survey. Mitigation identified for the <br /> project would be applicable under this scenario. — <br /> Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br /> The off-site alternative contains similar features as the project, such as agricultural crop land, <br /> creek beds,and rural residential structures. Therefore, it can be assumed that the types of <br /> hazardous materials that might exist at the off-site alternative would be similar to those of the — <br /> project. An assessment of the off-site alternative would need to be completed to determine if any <br /> hazardous materials or contamination exist on the site or if there is a potential for contamination <br /> at the site from any off-site sources in the area. Hazards and hazardous materials impacts — <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 5-18 ESA/203015 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />