Laserfiche WebLink
5.Other Statutory Considerations — <br /> Land Use — <br /> Impact 6.1: Cumulative development would not be expected to result in an overall <br /> cumulative adverse land use impact since the County has designated mining as an — <br /> acceptable use on agricultural land.This would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> As discussed in Section 4.2 of this EIR,the project would not conflict with existing and planned — <br /> land uses surrounding the site with the implementation of mitigation. The project will require the <br /> approval of a County Quarry Excavation Permit,the reclamation plan, and financial assurances <br /> for the project that must be in conformance with SMARA, the State Mining and Geology Board — <br /> regulations for surface mining and reclamation practice(CCR Title 14,Ch. S,Article 1, §3500 et <br /> seq.;Article 9 §3700 et seq.),San Joaquin County ordinances,and Stanislaus County ordinances. <br /> Other existing and proposed mining projects in the area are also required to obtain permits and be — <br /> consistent with County plans and policies as well as with SMARA, and must undergo CEQA <br /> review. Therefore,the project's effects on land use are not cumulatively considerable and <br /> cumulative development would not be expected to result in an overall significant cumulative — <br /> adverse land use impact since the County has designated mining as an acceptable use on <br /> agricultural land.Although there is now a significant concentration of mining in the Vernalis and <br /> Tracy areas,the location of these facilities is dictated exclusively by the location of the resource <br /> and marketplace. For these reasons, mining will most likely be limited to these areas. However, <br /> these projects would contribute to other types of adverse cumulative,community-wide and _ <br /> region-wide environmental impacts (i.e.,transportation, air quality,etc.). These cumulative <br /> impacts are identified below. <br /> Mitigation: No mitigation is required. <br /> Loss of Agricultural Productivity <br /> Impact 6.2: The project when combined with other large-scale mining operations in the <br /> area,would not add incrementally to the cumulative loss of agricultural production in the <br /> area This is a less-than-significant impact. — <br /> Much of the land in the vicinity of the project is considered highly productive farmland. A <br /> majority of the project site itself is classified as prime farmland, and other portions as farmland of — <br /> statewide importance and farmland of local importance. Four of the project site parcels are under <br /> Williamson Act Contracts. Two others were under non-renewal status at the time of the project <br /> application but the contract ended in 2005.Mining operations are allowable on agricultural — <br /> properties within the County subject to permitting. Quarry operations are considered a compatible <br /> use under the Williamson Act[Section 9-1810.3(b)(1)(W)], subject to a discretionary permit. <br /> Mined and reclaimed sites are generally reused for agricultural or open space once mining ceases. <br /> The reclamation of the project site would be completed in phases and would result in an ultimate <br /> end use of agricultural land and open space. All reclaimed slopes will be returned to land that can <br /> be used for agriculture. <br /> RMC Park Vernalis Ouany Mining antl Reclamatron Prgect 6-8 ESA/203015 <br /> Dreft Environmental Impact Report May 2006 <br />