Laserfiche WebLink
• Reactive Organic Gases (ROG): 10 tonslyear (55 lbs/day); <br /> • Oxides of Nitrogen (NOJ: 10 tons/year (55 lbs/day); and :k <br /> „ Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o): 15 tons/year (82 lbs/day). <br /> In accordance with the CCAA, the SJVUAPCD has adopted a New Source Review (NSR) �I <br /> r rule for the purpose of achieving a "no net increase in emissions from [District-permitted] <br /> sources." Any permitted, non-exempt source with a calculated pollutant emissions ;I <br /> exceeding established NSR thresholds are required to provide offsets in accordance with <br /> the requirements of the SJVUAPCD. The following thresholds are used for determining ;) <br /> offset requirements for new sources (Gormley, 1997): <br /> • Oxides of Sulfur (SO),): 150 pounds/day; <br /> • Carbon Monoxide (CO) in attainment areas: 550 pounds/day <br /> F • ; 1 <br /> Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o): 80 pounds/day; ;l <br /> Oxides of Nitrogen (NO.): 10 tonslyear (55 lbs/day); and 'I <br />! Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): 10 tons/year (55 lbs/day). ` <br /> �I <br /> In addition to quantitative impact analysis, qualitative'analysis is appropriate if a project's <br /> air quality impacts cannot be evaluated quantitatively. Qualitative thresholds should be a <br /> used as screening criteria to indicate the need for further analysis involving other air quality l <br /> issues such as hazardous and toxic emissions. Qualitative emission thresholds are <br /> applied primarily toward long-term emissions during the project's operational phase rather <br /> than short-term construction-related emissions. The SJVUAPCD recommends the use of <br /> I the following qualitative emission thresholds, based on: <br /> ii Potential to create or be near an objectionable odor; <br /> 1 . <br /> Potential for accidental release of air toxic emissions or acutely hazardous' <br /> materials; <br /> I Potential to emit an air toxic contaminant regulated by the District or on a <br /> M federal or state air toxic list; <br />` Burning of hazardous, medical, or municipal waste as waste-to-energy <br /> facilities; <br /> • Potential to produce a substantial amount of wastewater or potential for toxic i <br /> discharge; <br /> i <br /> �- Draft Environmental Impact Report 4-69 ER-96-3 <br /> l <br />