Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 0 . <br /> Sec. 3704(c) Piles or dumps of mining waste shall be stockpiled in such a manner as <br /> to facilitate phased reclamation. They shall be segregated from topsoil . <br /> and topsoil substitutes or growth media salvaged for use in reclamation. <br /> The proposed reclamation plan specifies the segregation of topsoil (A-horizon) and <br /> undifferentiated overburden into separate stockpiles. The reclamation plan indicates that <br /> the topsoil would be used in construction of the landscape berm along Koster Road. <br /> Therefore the proposed reclamation appears to comply with this section. <br /> Sec. 3704(d) Final reclaimed fill slopes, including permanent piles or dumps of mine <br /> �J <br /> waste rock and overburden, shall not exceed 2:1 (horizontal to vertical), <br /> except when site-specific geologic and engineering analysis demonstrate <br /> that the proposed final slope will have a minimum slope stability factor of <br /> safety that is suitable for the proposed end use, and when proposed final <br /> slope can be successfully revegetated. <br /> The proposed project includes 1.5:1 final reclaimed slopes (steeper than the SMARA <br /> standard) but provides a slope stability analysis that indicates that the minimum static <br /> factor of safety for the final reclaimed slopes would be 1.5. This factor of safety is <br /> generally considered appropriate for an end use that does not involve potential threats to <br /> existing structures and conforms with the requirements of the County Development Title <br /> (see discussion below). The stockpiles for overburden would have slopes of 2:1 or less. <br /> The proposed project, therefore, appears to be in compliance with this section. <br /> Sec. 3704(e) At closure, all fill slopes shall conform with the surrounding topography <br /> and approved/or end use. <br /> The reclaimed fill slopes at the project site would be constructed below existing grade. The <br /> reclaimed agricultural fields would have steep slopes separating them from the surrounding <br /> lands but these slopes would be internally draining and would not be expected to cause <br /> erosion or other adverse impacts to the surrounding topography. The agricultural fields <br /> would have similar topography to the existing reclaimed field and they would conform with <br /> the proposed end use. <br /> Sec. 3704(f) Cut slopes shall have a minimum slope factor of safety that is suitable for <br /> proposed end use and conform with the surrounding topography and end <br /> use. <br /> The proposed project has maximum cut slopes of 113:1. The slope stability analysis <br /> (Kleinfelder, 1997) concluded that these slopes have acceptable minimum factors of safety <br /> for static and dynamic (seismic) conditions during mining. The analysis, based on site- <br /> specific testing of subsurface conditions and conventional slope stability modeling, indicate <br /> that the slopes are suitably stable and conform with the requirements of this section. The <br /> proposed end use following reclamation (i.e., agriculture) presents a low-risk condition <br /> relative to slope stability hazards. However, the factors of safety calculated for the <br /> temporary cut slopes do not meet, in all cases, the minimum requirements for mining s <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 2 ER-96-3 ! <br />