My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004149
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36869
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-96-0001
>
SU0004149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:00:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:44:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004149
FACILITY_NAME
QX-96-0001
STREET_NUMBER
36869
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36869 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
9/22/1996 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36869\QX-96-01_EIR 96-3\SU0004149\PUB REC REL APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
782
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 0 0 . <br /> Sec. 3704(c) Piles or dumps of mining waste shall be stockpiled in such a manner as <br /> to facilitate phased reclamation. They shall be segregated from topsoil . <br /> and topsoil substitutes or growth media salvaged for use in reclamation. <br /> The proposed reclamation plan specifies the segregation of topsoil (A-horizon) and <br /> undifferentiated overburden into separate stockpiles. The reclamation plan indicates that <br /> the topsoil would be used in construction of the landscape berm along Koster Road. <br /> Therefore the proposed reclamation appears to comply with this section. <br /> Sec. 3704(d) Final reclaimed fill slopes, including permanent piles or dumps of mine <br /> �J <br /> waste rock and overburden, shall not exceed 2:1 (horizontal to vertical), <br /> except when site-specific geologic and engineering analysis demonstrate <br /> that the proposed final slope will have a minimum slope stability factor of <br /> safety that is suitable for the proposed end use, and when proposed final <br /> slope can be successfully revegetated. <br /> The proposed project includes 1.5:1 final reclaimed slopes (steeper than the SMARA <br /> standard) but provides a slope stability analysis that indicates that the minimum static <br /> factor of safety for the final reclaimed slopes would be 1.5. This factor of safety is <br /> generally considered appropriate for an end use that does not involve potential threats to <br /> existing structures and conforms with the requirements of the County Development Title <br /> (see discussion below). The stockpiles for overburden would have slopes of 2:1 or less. <br /> The proposed project, therefore, appears to be in compliance with this section. <br /> Sec. 3704(e) At closure, all fill slopes shall conform with the surrounding topography <br /> and approved/or end use. <br /> The reclaimed fill slopes at the project site would be constructed below existing grade. The <br /> reclaimed agricultural fields would have steep slopes separating them from the surrounding <br /> lands but these slopes would be internally draining and would not be expected to cause <br /> erosion or other adverse impacts to the surrounding topography. The agricultural fields <br /> would have similar topography to the existing reclaimed field and they would conform with <br /> the proposed end use. <br /> Sec. 3704(f) Cut slopes shall have a minimum slope factor of safety that is suitable for <br /> proposed end use and conform with the surrounding topography and end <br /> use. <br /> The proposed project has maximum cut slopes of 113:1. The slope stability analysis <br /> (Kleinfelder, 1997) concluded that these slopes have acceptable minimum factors of safety <br /> for static and dynamic (seismic) conditions during mining. The analysis, based on site- <br /> specific testing of subsurface conditions and conventional slope stability modeling, indicate <br /> that the slopes are suitably stable and conform with the requirements of this section. The <br /> proposed end use following reclamation (i.e., agriculture) presents a low-risk condition <br /> relative to slope stability hazards. However, the factors of safety calculated for the <br /> temporary cut slopes do not meet, in all cases, the minimum requirements for mining s <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 2 ER-96-3 ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.