My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004149
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36869
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-96-0001
>
SU0004149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:00:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:44:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004149
FACILITY_NAME
QX-96-0001
STREET_NUMBER
36869
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36869 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
9/22/1996 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36869\QX-96-01_EIR 96-3\SU0004149\PUB REC REL APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
782
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br /> The method of drainage of terraces for temporary slopes at set back <br /> lines shall be submitted to Development Services Division for <br /> I <br /> approval. <br /> The reclamation plan presents engineering drawings and specifications for a reclaimed <br /> slope drainage system which conform to the requirements of this standard. The plan <br /> includes bench drain catch basins on benches that are sloped into the fill at five percent. <br /> Each slope has at least one down-slope drain which is connected to the drainage basins. <br /> The maximum spacing of down-slope drainage pipes (at the base of the reclaimed slopes) <br /> would be 1,500 feet. <br /> i <br /> Sec. 9-1415.3(k) (3) Slope Modification Requirement. The Review Authority may <br /> require slopes flatter than those specified below for safety or <br /> aesthetic purposes if the proximity of residential and other urban <br /> uses, waterways or roads, the instability of materials, or the <br /> surrounding terrain so warrants. <br /> If after one.(1)year or more of extraction the approved slope does <br /> not remain stable, the Review Authority shall have the authority <br /> to reduce the slope or require other appropriate measures in the <br /> immediate area and other areas as deemed necessary in order to <br /> correct the condition as well as require the operator to correct the <br /> deteriorated slope. <br /> The reclamation plan does not specifically acknowledge this standard. However, the <br /> proposed project would be required to comply with the standard in the event of the <br /> deterioration of slopes at the project site (refer to Mitigation Measure 4.2-2c). It is possible <br /> that ineffective revegetation or slope failures could result in required reduction in the <br /> steepness of proposed slopes <br /> Sec. 9-1415.3(k)(4) Slope Stability Factors of Safety. When required in this Title to <br /> provide site-specific geologic and engineering slope stability analysis, <br /> the following minimum slope stability factors of safety shall apply: <br /> (A) A minimum factor of safety of 1.5 against static deep seated <br /> failure. <br /> (B) A minimum factor of safety of 1.5 against static surficial failure. <br /> (C) A minimum factor of safety of 1.1 against seismic failure. <br /> i <br /> The slope stability analyses prepared for the project (Kleinfelder, 1997) evaluated the <br /> potential for failure of the excavation and reclaimed slopes under static and pseudo-static <br /> (seismic) conditions. The results of the analysis indicate that the minimum factors of safety <br /> required by the standard would be met for the final slopes. <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 6 ER-96-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.