My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0009944
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LAMMERS
>
25341
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1300177
>
SU0009944
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:34:19 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:47:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0009944
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1300177
STREET_NUMBER
25341
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LAMMERS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376-
APN
20925036
ENTERED_DATE
2/20/2014 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
25341 S LAMMERS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
2/19/2014 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LAMMERS\25341\PA-1300177\SU0009944\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LAMMERS\25341\PA-1300177\SU0009944\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LAMMERS\25341\PA-1300177\SU0009944\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V <br /> would'have come and gone without our'knowledge. <br /> We, the people who LIVE in our quiet neighborhood, off our little gravel road, <br /> unlike the owner of the property where the tower is proposed (he owns vacant <br /> land and will not have to live with the tower in close proximity to his HOME) are <br /> opposed to'Veriizon marching in and completely disregarding the concerns ofthe <br /> people who LIVE here. The tower would be an eyesore as well as a potential <br /> health hazard. There is no question that our property values would be damaged. <br /> Tracy has plenty of property where this tower would be MUCH more suitable. It <br /> is definitely NOT suitable for one of the few remaining rural properties just <br /> outside the Tim-its. <br /> We want to keep our private gravel road as is with the posted speed limit at 10 <br /> mph. We feel that this is what keeps unwanted visitors from venturing into our <br /> neighborhood. Burglary and crime is not existent in our area for the moment. <br /> All the neighbors snare in watching out for each other. 'We are flew in numbers <br /> but aligned in our love of this area. <br /> Verizon has been very sneaky and underhanded; promising all of us an <br /> opportunity to make our feelings known and addressing our concerns, yet they <br /> went'behind ourbacks and got their permit,knowing that if we UID have an <br /> opportunity to address our concerns, that their permit and their tower would be <br /> in serious jeopardy. <br /> Now, we have been told that in order to challenge and oppose the permit, we <br /> are required to pay a fee of$-3S3 to 'San Joaquin County? How is that fee <br /> justified? Verizon is guilty of completely ignoring their obligation to perform due <br /> diligence; to give us an opportunity to address the Planning Commission and <br /> oppose the tower. The home owners should not be punished financially for this. <br /> Verizon and their representatives should be the ones penalized, not the home <br /> owners, who were deliberately left uninformed and completely in the dark about <br /> through every gep of the planning/permit phase. <br /> We, the undersigned, hope that San Joaquin County Planning Commission take <br /> our concerns seriously; come to our neighborhood, talk to the homeowners and <br /> see'how ltoitally inappropriate our little rural neig'hbor'hood, at the end of our <br /> small, unpaved gravel road is for this project. We hope you will agree that this is <br /> NOT the place for this monstrosity. <br /> We greatly appreciate your consideration in this matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.