SU0005222 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mitial Study—LID Annexation and for sewer and recycled water, the Phase I Expansion of Water Recycling Plant No. I EIR. All of these documents are cited by reference. Any impacts associated with these services are already mitigated by these previous documents and no additional analysis is necessary. Copies of the documents are available in the San Joaquin County Community Development Department Office. 2.4.2 Impacts to Biological Resources Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact with impact Mitigation Incorporation IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES--Would the project: a) Adversely impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, ❑ ❑ ❑ any endangered,rare,or threatened species,as listed in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (sections 670.2 or 670.5) or in Title 50,Code of Federal Regulations(sections 17.11 or 17.12)? b)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other ❑ ❑ ❑ sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? d) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands ❑ ❑ ❑ as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including, but not limited to, marsh, venial pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,hydrological interruption,or other means? e) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or ❑ ❑ ❑ N migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? I)Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological ❑ ❑ ❑ resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? g) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation ❑ ❑ ❑ Plan,Natural Conservation Community Plan,or other approved local, regional,or state habitat conservation plan? The City, in its drafting and subsequent certification of the River Islands EIR, used a broad based approved in following regulatory guidance for biological resources. Major impacts to identified habitats (both terrestrial and aquatic)are part of an extensive mitigation program. The proposed LID annexation poses no new additional impacts to biological resources than those contemplated in the River Islands EIR, 30