Laserfiche WebLink
Fj� n <br /> F! November 8, 2005 <br /> NOA Project Number: E05123B <br /> F1constituents of concern. <br /> 2.0 GROUND WATER ANALYSIS <br /> F1 <br /> 1 2.1 Regional Ground Water <br /> 4 A discussion of regional ground water,including depth to ground water and directional ground <br /> water gradient,is included in Section 4.1 of the SSS. Ground water lies between 90 and 100 feet <br /> below ground surface and flows at a gradient of about 20 feet per mile to the east in the vicinity of <br /> the Site in 1999. <br /> 2.2 Potential Ground Water Contamination Issues <br /> A discussion of issues related to potential groundwater contamination is included in Section 4.2 of <br /> the SSS. <br /> F12.3 Current and Future On-Site Ground Water Uses <br /> ' No domestic water well-exists on 8.2 Acre portion of the property. No residential uses exist on the <br /> site. The site presently contains vineyards. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUND WATER <br /> 3.1 Current Off-Site Sources of Nitrate <br /> We recognize that septic systems, agriculture, and dairies in the area may be the most significant <br /> sources of nitrate. Septic tank use in the vicinity is discussed in Section 3.4 of the SSS. <br /> I <br /> The water sample wa yz for nitrate and DBCP. DBCP was not detected in the water sample. <br /> Nitrate was found t 13.9 PWLN03,below the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 45 mg/L- <br /> NO3 set by the Unit aces EPA. Details regarding the water sample analysis can be found in <br /> Section 4.4 of the SSS. <br /> Fi 3.2 Contribution of Rainfall <br /> An estimate of the quantity and quality of rainfall was required for the nitrate loading analysis. The <br /> estimate of deep percolation of rain is based on the average monthly precipitation of rain fall and <br /> evapotranspiration for the Lodi area of California. An estimate of potential deep percolation of <br /> rain determines whether the average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly potential <br /> evapotranspiration. if so, then the difference is potential deep percolation. This method does not <br /> consider runoff: See Plate 2 for the data and calculation. <br /> 3 <br />