My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002182
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOWER SACRAMENTO
>
10702
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-00-21
>
SU0002182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:04 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 11:07:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002182
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-00-21
STREET_NUMBER
10702
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
LOWER SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
APN
08405004
ENTERED_DATE
10/23/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10702 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\10702\UP-00-21\SU0002182\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\10702\UP-00-21\SU0002182\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\10702\UP-00-21\SU0002182\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT <br /> ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Project Impact Mitigation <br /> The December 2000 San Joaquin County Traffic Study Guidelines were used to define <br /> conditions where a project significantly impacts area roadways and intersections, and the <br /> methodology required to calculate the fair share contribution of a development to the costs of <br /> improvements necessary to fully mitigate significant project impacts. This criteria is <br /> described below for Cumulative Plus Project Conditions: <br /> If the LOS for [Cumulative Plus Project Conditions] exceeds the County's <br /> LOS standards, then mitigation measures that would improve the LOS to an <br /> acceptable level must be identified. LOS must be expressed in terms of delay <br /> in seconds for intersections, and vehicles per hour for roadway segments3, in <br /> addition to the corresponding letter(A-F) designation. <br /> If the LOS for conditions at a given location is already at an unacceptable <br /> LOS, then the impacts must be assessed in terms of We ratio ' (for roadway <br /> segments) or 'delay' (for intersection approaches). If the We ratio'for a <br /> roadway segment, under `cumulative plus project'conditions, exceeds the v/c <br /> ratio for the same roadway segment under 'cumulative' conditions then <br /> mitigation measures that would return the `v/c' ratio to the cumulative' level <br /> must be identified. Similarly, if the 'delay' at a given intersection approach <br /> under 'cumulative plus project' conditions exceeds the 'delay'for the same <br /> intersection approach under 'cumulative'condition, then mitigation measures <br /> that would return the 'delay' to the 'existing' conditions, then mitigation <br /> measures that would return the 'delay' to the 'cumulative' level must be <br /> identified. <br /> 3 As discussed earlier, and as agreed to by San Joaquin County engineering staff, roadway analysis within this <br /> report describes roadway LOS in terms ofdaily traffic and LOSgrades as reported in the "1998 LOS <br /> Handbook", Florida DOT. <br /> ibid. <br /> Delta Church of the Nazarene July 3,1001 <br /> Traffic Impact Analysis 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.