SU0004665 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6 SSS • This finding cannot be made because surrounding parcels in the vicinity do not exceed the 60% building coveragellot size ratio permitted in the C-C zone. 2. No Special Privileges. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated, and • This finding cannot be made because surrounding parcels in the vicinity currently do not exceed the maximum 60% building coverage/lot size ratio as permitted in the C-C zone. i 3. Use Authorized. The Variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the regulation governing the parcel of property. • This finding can be made because the proposed use (Professional Services) may be permitted in the C-C zone with an approved Improvement Plan application. If the Variance application is approved, an Improvement Plan will be required prior to development. Site Plan i Currently, the proposed parking area does not appear to be adequate for the anticipated office expansion. The applicant states that he has a parking agreement with Grace Community Fellowship Church for 12 parking spaces Monday through Saturday. The parking lot is within 300 feet of the project parcel as required by Development Title Section 9-1015.4(b). The applicant proposes that the new building will be used for office space (Use Type: Professional Services). This Use Type would require 3.3 parking spaces for each 1000 square feet of building (Development Title Table 9-1015.3(b)). As a result, the proposed 4,427 square foot building would require 15 off-street parking spaces (if the Lot Line Adjustment is not completed, 17 spaces are required for proposed and existing building coverage). The parking agreement would supply only 12 ' of the required 15 parking spaces. Adequate parking shall be provided at submittal of the Improvement Plan. The proposed refuse enclosure can only be accessed through t the adjacent parcel. The applicant would be required to obtain an easement for access to this enclosure or provide an alternate access. The Variance application does not approve the Site Plan as submitted, it only addresses the building coverage/lot size ratio. Opposition The Community Development Department has received one letter of support for this project and one letter of opposition. The opponent is concerned that the parking spaces will not accommodate the proposed office growth. Also, he is concerned that the refuse enclosure will only be accessible through the opponents parcel if the building coverage of the parcel is increased. I 3