My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002265
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOWER SACRAMENTO
>
19152
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-97-09
>
SU0002265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:08 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 11:09:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002265
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-97-09
STREET_NUMBER
19152
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
LOWER SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
01323027
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
19152 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\19152\UP-97-09\SU0002265\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\19152\UP-97-09\SU0002265\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\19152\UP-97-09\SU0002265\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Analysis <br /> Background <br /> On July 21, 1994, the San Joaquin County Planning Commission approved a Use Permit application for <br /> the Woodbridge Community Church for a 300-seat, 6,000-square-foot worship hall, a 6,000-square-foot <br /> multi-purpose building, and a 2,500-square-foot office building. This approval required that all conditions <br /> of approval be met and all necessary building permits be obtained within 18 months. <br /> In November 1995, a Revisions of Approved Actions application was filed for the purposes of phasing <br /> the project and minimizing the requirements for construction of a solid masonry wall. On February 15, <br /> 1996, the San Joaquin County Planning Commission conditionally approved the Revisions of Approved <br /> Actions for Use Permit Application No. UP-94-9. The project was slightly modified, and this approval <br /> was for a 300-seat, 7500-square-foot worship hall, a 6,000-square-foot multi-purpose building, and a <br /> 1,600-square-foot office. Condition No. 1.a. of this approval provided for constructing the project in three <br /> phases, in accordance with the phasing identified on the Site Plan dated January 26, 1996. Phase I <br /> required that all conditions of approval be complied with, all necessary building permits be issued and <br /> remain in force; and all necessary permits from other agencies be issued and remain in force prior to <br /> January 30, 1997. According to the schedule, Phase I was to have begun immediately and consisted of <br /> the site grading and construction of the multi-purpose building and other related site improvements. A <br /> grading permit was issued February 2, 1996, but the building permit was not obtained for construction of <br /> the multi-purpose building by the required date of January 30, 1997. As a result, this condition was not <br /> complied with, and the Use Permit approval lapsed. <br /> Subsequently, a new application (UP-97-9) was filed for the same project that had expired. The Planning <br /> Commission heard the application on June 15, 1998, and voted 7-0 to conditionally approve the project. <br /> Condition No. t.b. was modified to allow additional time to commence each of the three phases. The <br /> building permits have been issued for Phase 1. It was at that time the applicant realized Public Works <br /> Condition No. 2.e. required a 'secured' Deferred Frontage and Roadway Improvement Agreement. <br /> Deferred Frontage and Roadway Improvement Agreement <br /> At the time the application was approved, the Public Works Department required that the improvements <br /> be secured in lieu of the preparation of a traffic study. Public Works concurs that the left-tum and <br /> acceleration lanes at the south entrance to the project site will not be required for some time. Public <br /> Works therefore concurs with the request that the Deferred Frontage and Roadway Improvement <br /> Agreement not be secured. The Agreement will be recorded and constitute a lien against the property. <br /> V San Joaquin County UP-97-9\Woodbridge <br /> Community Development Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.