My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002332
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOWER SACRAMENTO
>
19350
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-94-09
>
SU0002332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:11 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 11:09:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002332
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-94-09
STREET_NUMBER
19350
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
LOWER SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
19350 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\19350\UP-94-09\SU0002332\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\19350\UP-94-09\SU0002332\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\19350\UP-94-09\SU0002332\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Analysis <br /> Aartman Trucking <br /> The applicant has indicated that the trucking facility has existed at this site for approximately 17 years. <br /> However, the trucking facility has been operating without the benefit of permits from the County, and the <br /> Development Title does not permit trucking terminals in the AG zones. The trucking facility may be <br /> permitted as an accessory use if the trucks only haul products associated with the cheese processing <br /> facility. Therefore, it is recommended that approval of this project be conditioned to restrict the trucking <br /> facility from hauling for off-site companies. It is recommended that the applicant's request to phase out <br /> the use over a two-year period be denied. <br /> Odors <br /> Public Health Services and the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District have indicated that <br /> waste water from this facility has generated numerous odor complaints from as far as three miles away. <br /> Since 1989, the District has validated at least 12 odor complaints. However, in the previous year, the <br /> facility has taken actions to reduce the problem, and only one complaint has been verified. The applicant <br /> has indicated that this expansion will allow the installation of new equipment and procedures that will <br /> further reduce odors. The Environmental Health Division requires that written approval be obtained from <br /> the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to the issuance of building permits regarding <br /> filing a Waste Management Report. <br /> Traffic/Circulation <br /> The existing cheese facility has 64 employees. The applicant has stated that this proposal includes new, <br /> more efficient equipment, and the applicant expects to add only 11 new employees. The applicant <br /> estimates that six trucks per day deliver milk, one truck per day picks up cheese, and one truck per day <br /> brings supplies. The applicant expects this proposal to increase the truck traffic to 20 trucks delivering <br /> milk per day. two or three trucks picking up cheese, plus three trucks delivering supplies. Thus, the <br /> proposed cheese facility will result in an additional 19 (gross) trucks per day. However, the applicant <br /> notes that the trucking facility dispatches and receives 20 trucks per day, six of those trucks arrive with <br /> milk for the cheese processing facility, and 14 arrive empty. With expansion of the cheese facility, the 14 <br /> trucks that arrive empty will be replaced by 11 that arrive loaded with milk. Thus, the cheese facility <br /> expansion will result in a net increase of only five trucks per day. These trucks plus the 11 additional <br /> emplovees are not expected to generate a significant volume of traffic. <br /> The City of Manteca has indicated that truck traffic from this Bate can become disruptive to the flow of <br /> traffic on Airport Way. The City recommends the installation of left- and right-turn lanes on Airport Way. <br /> However, the Department of Public Works has reviewed the City's request and does not agree with the <br /> requirement for turn lanes. Pubfic Works recommends that driveways and driveway approaches be <br /> improved to County and Fire Code standards. Any gates on truck driveways shall be set back 65 feet <br /> as re-wired by County ordinance. <br /> San Joaquin County UP•94-4/De Groot <br /> community 2eveicement Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.