SU0007444 SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Thompson & Folger East Page 12 of 13 Our Project Number: LES080593 February 10, 2009 channels; however, there is no evidence to suggest that the offsite AST has impacted the subject property at this time. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Given the historical uses of agricultural chemicals and petroleum products on the subject property, meaningful conclusions regarding the presence or extent of such material cannot be determined without soil sampling and analysis. Such sampling and analysis is especially warranted in the conversion of a4ricultural land into residential use, which is not the case for this property. Should future residents of the subject property be interested in determining the quality of their drinking water, EHD should be contacted for direction regarding the potential for impacts to groundwater from the agricultural history of the property and vicinity. Any wells which will not remain in use should be abandoned under EHD oversight. Any additional infrastructure or buried debris that may be encountered during site grading or development should be removed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable regulations. As-the_sa&is_developed, any stained soil or sources of contamination identified should be characterized and properly disposed in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. 6.0 LIMITATIONS This report was compiled as a Surface and Subsurface Contamination Report for the subject property. This report contains information and data provided to NOA by several sources. NOA in no way warrants the accuracy or completeness of the information provided to this investigation by those sources. It should be noted that when an environmental assessment is completed without sample collection and quantitative analysis of soil and groundwater beneath the site, as in this study, no statement of scientific certainty can be made regarding latent subsurface conditions which may be the result of on-site or off-site sources. The findings and conclusions of this report are not scientific certainties, but rather, probabilities based on professional judgment concerning the significance of the data gathered during the course of this investigation. NOA is not able to represent that the site or adjoining land contains no hazardous waste, oil, underground storage tanks, or other latent condition beyond that detected or observed by NOA during the Surface and Subsurface assessment. The possibility always exists for contaminants to migrate through surface water, air, or groundwater. Our office has not been provided with specific criteria for the development of this report other than a request to evaluate the property in question for possible problems related to toxic or hazardous agents, nor have we been directed to address any specific questions concerning the site. Should there be a need to conduct an investigation into a specific question not addressed in this report, contact our office immediately regarding your concerns. 902 Industrial Way• Lodi,CA 95240•209.367.3701 -Fax 209.369.4228 02009 Neil O.Anderson&Associates.Inc.