Laserfiche WebLink
concluded the southbound ..dared left-right lane should be split int i parate, exclusive left and <br /> right turn lanes to ensure any impacts from traffic will be less-than-significant. The Department of <br /> Public Works has included this mitigation measure as a recommended Condition of Approval. <br /> With the implementation of this mitigation measure as a Condition of Approval, the significant <br /> traffic related impacts to Eight Mile Road and North State Route 99 East Frontage Road level of <br /> service will be reduced to a less-than-significant level. <br /> 13. Land Use <br /> 13. b. This project conforms with the current zoning of AG-40 (General Agriculture, 40 acre <br /> minimum lot size) and the General Plan designation of AIG (General Agriculture). The <br /> surrounding uses are agricultural. This activity is conditionally permitted in the AG-40 zone with <br /> an approved Use Permit application. This activity will have a less than significant impact on the <br /> surrounding land because mitigation measures will be taken for noise and traffic levels. <br /> ' f <br /> Williamson Act <br /> The applicant is proposing to have secondary access through a twenty-five foot wide access <br /> driveway from Eight Mile Road. The proposed secondary access is located on the adjacent <br /> parcel to the east (APN# 059-260-76) and shall be acquired via a proposed Lot Line Adjustment. <br /> The adjacent parcel is currently under the Williamson Act and a Notice of Nonrenewal was filed <br /> on October 3, 2005. The Department of Conservation submitted a letter dated October 11, 2007 <br /> and recommended postponing the lot line adjustment until the parcel is out of contract. The <br /> proposed-lot line adjustment did not meet all of the following required findings for land under <br /> contract: <br /> 1. The new contract or contracts would enforceably restrict the adjusted boundaries of the parcel <br /> for an initial term for at least as long as the unexpired term of the rescinded contract or <br /> contracts but not for less than 10 years. <br /> 2. There is no net decrease in the amount of the acreage restricted. In cases where two parcels <br /> involved in a lot fine adjustment are both subject to contracts rescinded pursuant to this <br /> section, this finding will be satisfied if the aggregate acreage of the land restricted by the i <br /> rescinded contracts. <br /> 3. At least 90 percent of the land under the former contract or contracts remains under the new <br /> contract or contracts. <br /> 4. After the lot line adjustment, the parcels of land subject to contract will be large enough to <br /> sustain their agricultural use, as defined in Section 51222. <br /> 5. The lot line adjustment would not compromise the long-term agricultural productivity of the <br /> parcel or other agricultural lands subject to a contract or contracts. <br /> 6. The lot line adjustment is not likely to result in the removal of adjacent land from agricultural ' <br /> use. <br /> 7. The lot line adjustment does not result in a greater number of developable parcels than <br /> existed prior to the adjustment, or an adjusted lot that is inconsistent with the general plan. <br /> The contract will expire on March 1, 2016. The applicant has agreed to postpone the Lot Line <br /> Adjustment until the land is out of contract. The contract must expire prior to commencement of <br /> Phase IV or V. As a Condition of Approval, the applicant can not proceed with Phase IV or V until <br /> the Notice of Lot Line Adjustment has been recorded, recordation of new deeds, and the transfer <br /> of new deeds, and all other prerequisites for Phase IV or Phase V are met. Therefore, there will <br /> be no impacts to land under contract. <br /> Initial Study -9 - Rev 5-00 <br />