Laserfiche WebLink
VI. GROUNDWATER <br /> Groundwater tests were not performed as there are no existing wells on site. The <br /> County Health Department has records of water tests on nearby wells. <br /> VII. CONCLUSION <br /> Based on the results of the percolation tests and the soil profile, it is Dillon & <br /> Murphy's opinion that the existing is suited for a typical on-site sewage disposal system. The <br /> proposed system, however, should be properly designed and installed according to the current <br /> San Joaquin County criteria. <br /> It should be noted that the location of the percolation test was chosen near the proposed <br /> disposal field. <br /> Based on the depth to ground water in the area, and the size of the proposed parcels, it <br /> is our opinion that the installation of any new proposed septic systems, if properly installed, <br /> should not adversely affect the quality of ground water in the area. <br /> VIII. LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the <br /> proposed development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed <br /> at the time we excavated our test hole and performed the percolation test. It was assumed that <br /> the test hole and percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the <br /> general area. <br /> Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in <br /> accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in <br /> lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of <br /> professional opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> DILLON & MURPHY <br /> Jo urphy <br /> E. 45,277 <br /> -2- <br />