Laserfiche WebLink
File No. 20-3563-01A� ]�'� KEE1NFEEDER <br /> March 3 , 1992 <br /> ITEM C-3 • <br /> "The depth and gradient of the water table; " <br /> During our residence surveys on February 27 , 1992 , we were <br /> able to measure groundwater in five wells. The groundwater <br /> was measured at depths varying from approximately 7 inches <br /> (location 1 on Plate I) to approximately 7 feet (location <br /> 2 on Plate I) below existing ground surface. The <br /> difference in depth to groundwater appears to be partially <br /> due to variations in elevation throughout the area. The <br /> regional groundwater depth map for spring 1991, published <br /> by the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water <br /> Conservation District, Plate II, does not indicate the <br /> depth to groundwater in this area. <br /> Based on County requirements for a small parcel split <br /> project, we are not required to establish an cn-site <br /> groundwater gradient by drilling test borings. We are <br /> providing a general estimate of the groundwater gradient <br /> based on the regional groundwater elevation map for spring <br /> 1991, published by the San Joaquin County Flood Control and <br /> Water Conservation District, Plate III. Based on this <br /> map, we conclude that the main groundwater gradient is in <br /> roughly the northerly direction. <br /> ITEM C-5• <br /> "Other information as required by the San Joaquin Local Health <br /> District to determine the cumulative effect of the existing and the <br /> proposed development on groundwater contamination; " <br /> We note that our scope of services did not include a <br /> detailed evaluation of the potential for the septic systems <br /> to affect the quality of groundwater. However, the project <br /> involves only a 10-acre split from the approximate 63-acre <br /> property. Therefore, in our opinion the likelihood of a <br /> significant change in the nitrate level of the groundwater <br /> beneath the site, due to one or two additional systems, is <br /> remote. If additional more concentrated development is <br /> planned in the area, we suggest that consideration be given <br /> to completing a nitrate loading study. <br /> As requested in the County "Conditions of Approval , " we <br /> collected a water sample from the well located on site and <br /> delivered the sample to FGL Environmental laboratory in <br /> Stockton for nitrate content testing. The test results <br /> will be submitted under separate cover as soon as the <br /> results are available from FGL Environmental . <br /> This completes our scope of work at this time. Based on the above <br /> information, it is our opinion that the two proposed parcels are <br /> Copyright 1992 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 3 of 4 <br />