Laserfiche WebLink
evaluation of the overall traffic noise,this analysis is misleading. A typical noise <br /> analysis for traffic noise impacts would first evaluate the existing traffic noise <br /> levels and compare them to the standard, and then evaluate the existing+ project <br /> noise levels to show the comparison. <br /> The BAC report estimated the project-related truck trips to result in an interior <br /> Ldn of 38 dB at a distance of 60 feet. j.c. brennan & associates, Inc. utilized <br /> the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA RD77-108) traffic noise <br /> prediction model to evaluate the project-related truck traffic noise levels along <br /> E. River Road. The inputs assumed 248 total truck trips, with 66 of those trips <br /> occurring during the daytime hours. It assumed a speed of 40 mph (This is <br /> probably underestimating the actual travel speeds). The FHWA traffic noise <br /> prediction model resulted in an interior Ldn of 41 dBA. <br /> 17.Page 34 of the BAC report provides a discussion entitled"Traffic Noise Impacts <br /> Relative to Existing Nighttime Hourly Noise Levels Without the Project'. <br /> This analysis seems to indicate that there is no significant noise impact due to <br /> truck traffic as it is compared to the ambient noise environment. <br /> Based upon the BAC report, the project could typically result in 26 hourly truck <br /> trips per hour during the nighttime hours. Based upon Table 6 of the BAC report, <br /> the average measured hourly background noise levels during the nighttime <br /> periods ranged between 59 dBA Leq and 62 dBA Leq at a distance of 60 feet <br /> from the centerline (Site 4). This corresponds with the closest building fagade to <br /> the roadway, as stated in the BAC report. If you use the lowest SEL value shown <br /> in the BAC report for truck passbys (79 dBA) at 60 feet, the Leq associated with <br /> the 26 trucks would be 62 dBA. Therefore, the nighttime noise levels would <br /> increase between 3 dBA and 4 dBA Leq. Based upon the FICON criteria shown <br /> in Table 3 of the report, this would result in a significant increase in noise levels. <br /> What the analysis does not mention, is that the increase in noise levels which <br /> trigger a significant impact is based upon an increase in noise levels of the same <br /> character. So, if the ambient noise during the nighttime period is not a function of <br /> truck traffic, the increase in noise levels due to truck traffic could be more <br /> annoying than indicated. <br /> 18. Page 29 of the BAC report provides an Analysis of Potential Project Noise <br /> Impacts. <br /> • Asphalt Plant impacts are considered less than significant. Based upon <br /> our review, as described earlier in this review, the BAC report states that <br /> they utilize the noise measurement data collected at Sites A and B to <br /> isolate the asphalt plant noise levels. This process was used to determine <br /> the potential noise levels during nighttime operations. Once again, the <br /> noise measurement locations do not accurately represent potential noise <br /> levels at the elevated residences. This is due to the fact that the noise <br /> measurement location used for evaluating the asphalt plant operations was <br /> 8 <br />